Abuse and overreaction by police force not unusual
- Subtitle: Law Library
The next thing [Cheye] Calvo remembers is the sound of his mother-in-law screaming. He ran to the window and saw heavily armed men clad in black rushing his front door. Next came the explosion. He’d later learn that this was when the police blew open his front door. Then there was gunfire. Then boots stomping the floor. Then more gunfire. Calvo, still in his boxers, screamed, “I’m upstairs, please don’t shoot!” He was instructed to walk downstairs with his hands in the air, the muzzles of two guns pointed directly at him. He still didn’t know it was the police. He described what happened next at a Cato Institute forum six weeks later. “At the bottom of the stairs, they bound my hands, pulled me across the living room, and forced me to kneel on the floor in front of my broken door. I thought it was a home invasion. I was fearful that I was about to be executed.” I later asked Calvo what might have happened if he’d had a gun in his home for self-defense. His answer: “I’d be dead.” In another interview, he would add, “The worst thing I could have done was defend my home.”
Rise of the Warrior Cop: The Militarization of America’s Police Forces by Radley Balko, PublicAffairs, 2013, pp. 382.
Calvo’s mother-in-law was face-down on the kitchen floor, the tomato-artichoke sauce she was preparing still sitting on the stove. Her first scream came when one of the SWAT officers pointed his gun at her from the other side of the window. The police department would later argue that her scream gave them the authority to enter the home without knocking, announcing themselves, and waiting for someone to let them in.
Rather than obeying the SWAT team demands to “get down” as they rushed in, Georgia Porter simply froze with fear. They pried the spoon from her hand, put a gun to her head, and shoved her to the floor. They asked, “Where are they? Where are they?” She had no idea what they were talking about. She told them to look in the basement. She would later tell the Washington Post, “If somebody puts a gun to your head and asks you a question, you better come up with an answer. Then I shut my eyes. Oh, God, I thought they were going to shoot me next.”
Calvo’s dogs Payton and Chase were dead by the time Calvo was escorted to the kitchen. Payton had been shot in the face almost as soon as the police entered the home. One bullet went all the way through him and lodged in a radiator, missing Porter by only a couple of feet. Chase ran. The cops shot him once, from the back, then chased him into the living room and shot him again.
Even after they realized they had just mistakenly raided the mayor’s house, the officers didn’t apologize to Calvo or Porter. Instead, they told Calvo that they were both “parties of interest” and that they should consider themselves lucky they weren’t arrested. Calvo in particular, they said, was still under suspicion because when armed men blew open his door, killed his dogs, and pointed their guns at him and his-mother-in-law, he hadn’t responded “in a typical manner.”
Such stories are far too common, unfortunately, and no one does a better job keeping track of them than libertarian journalist Radley Balko. Writing for the Huffington Post after several years at Reason, Balko has chronicled dozens of nightmarish stories about prosecutorial abuse and dangerous — and often deadly — overreaction by police forces. And now he has written what might be the most important book of the year.
The American Bill of Rights contains a provision against the quartering of military personnel in civilian households — a reaction to the stationing of British soldiers in American cities, a grievance which led to the American revolution. But you’d hardly know it today, when you see the equipment, gear, and tactics used by SWAT teams even in medium-sized American communities.
Indeed, SWAT teams have become so ubiquitous it’s hard to believe they’re a relatively recent invention. Following the Watts riots in 1965, soon-to-be Los Angeles police chief Darryl Gates created the country’s first special weapons and tactics force, quickly using it in high-profile confrontations against radical groups like the Black Panthers and Symbionese Liberation Army — with the media in tow.
Gates figures heavily in Balko’s narrative — he was ahead of his time in acquiring surplus armoured personnel carriers (disingenuously marked “rescue vehicle”) for the LAPD. But even he refrained from many of the tactics commonly used today.
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court of the United States (under then-chief justice Earl Warren) was issuing consistently liberal decisions — most notably Miranda — which extended the rights of the accused. With crime becoming a more important issue for voters during that turbulent era, the Nixon administration seized an opportunity to crack down on perhaps the most easily demonized class then and now — illicit drug users. The age of paramilitary-style assaults in the service of civilian law enforcement had begun.
The “war on drugs” escalated in the ’80s, and police tactics became increasingly aggressive — not just against gangs and drug traffickers, but against people keeping small amounts of marijuana for their own use. On paper, “no-knock” raids, in which police burst into a home without having to knock and announce their presence, were only allowed after strict scrutiny by a judge. In practice, police requests for no-knock warrants were rubber-stamped by the courts. SWAT teams, meanwhile, began showing up in smaller cities, then the suburbs, and even rural areas.
Crime in America has dramatically declined since the early 1990s, but police tactics have only become more aggressive, aided by a series of court decisions that have neutered the Fourth Amendment (which is supposed to guard against unreasonable search and seizure). Some would argue a clear cause and effect, but Balko convincingly argues the fall in violent crime has occurred despite the militarization of police, not because of it.
Indeed, aggressive police raids — where doors are kicked in, machine guns are held to civilians’ heads, and houses are completely ransacked — create a backlash against the police and against the legal system in general, especially when these tactics are used against “crimes” as mundane as poker games, checking high school students’ lockers for drugs, and even cracking down on unlicensed hairdressers.
Balko notes a backlash against police militarization has been building in recent years, a promising development undermined by the fact American politicians tend to be outraged by this kind of thing when the other party controls the White House. His main proposal for reform is ending the costly, unworkable, and devastating “war on drugs.” But he acknowledges this is extremely unlikely — though with a few states voting to legalize weed entirely, who knows?
In the alternative, Balko suggests more community policing, having SWAT team members wear video cameras, and curtailing the practice of civil asset forfeiture (in which property is seized from people accused of drug-related offences, and which in practice has become a serious revenue stream for federal, state, and municipal governments).
But this is just an American phenomenon, right? To a much greater extent than in Canada, yes. But ask the family of Sammy Yatim how quickly our own police officers reach for their weapons.
Damian J. Penny, a native of Mt. Pearl, Nfld., is a family law practitioner with Bedford Law in Bedford, N.S. His blog can be found at www.damianpenny.com and his Twitter feed at www.twitter.com/damianpenny. He can be reached at email@example.com.
Column: Law Library