<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>June 2012 - The going rate</title>
		<description>Discuss June 2012 - The going rate</description>
		<link>http://www.canadianlawyermag.com/4191/june-2012-the-going-rate.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 01:08:35 -0500</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.canadianlawyermag.com/feed/com_k2/4191.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>President</title>
			<link>http://www.canadianlawyermag.com/4191/june-2012-the-going-rate.html#comment-1035</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I liked reviewing your rate chart. I think the only thing that people may not consider, is that in an uncontested situation, it is possible the Defendant never hired a lawyer, meaning the total fees for both parties could be constructed to be the fee of the one lawyer. However, in a contested situation, there likey are TWO laywers involved. Therefore, total fees for the two parties could be double. As well, the fees do NOT reflect disbursements. Debbie Ward, President of the Canadian Legal Resource Centre Inc. www.canadianlegal.org]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Debbie Ward</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 17:07:51 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.canadianlawyermag.com/4191/june-2012-the-going-rate.html#comment-1035</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
