Skip to content

Groia's civility hearing starts tomorrow

|Written By Glenn Kauth
Joe Groia
Joe Groia argues the law society isn’t the place to be regulating courtroom conduct.

A high-profile civility case will be before a Law Society of Upper Canada disciplinary panel tomorrow. The proceedings against securities lawyer Joe Groia are set to run from Aug. 2-4. Earl Cherniak is representing Groia, while J. Thomas Curry and Jaan Lilles will present the case for the law society.

The long-running case stems from Groia’s actions in R. v. Felderhof. His client, John Felderhof, was facing insider-trading charges related to the infamous Bre-X Minerals Ltd. gold-dusting scandal. During the proceedings, Groia accused prosecutors for the Ontario Securities Commission of abuse of process and professional misconduct, largely over disclosure issues, said they were trying to convict his client “at all costs.” Judges later sharply criticized his rhetoric.

The LSUC allegations accuse Groia of repeated instances of “rude, improper or disruptive conduct” and of failing to treat the court with respect. They also accuse him of making “uninformed criticism of the conduct of prosecutors for the OSC.” In addition, he allegedly undermined the integrity of the profession by dealing with prosecutors in a manner that was “abusive, offensive or otherwise inconsistent with the proper tone of a professional communication from a lawyer.”

The LSUC has held up the case an example of its commitment to taking civility matters seriously. Groia, however, has defended his right to advocate vigorously for his client and argues the law society isn’t the place to be regulating courtroom conduct.

  • F. Galvin
    The longest period for the law society to move, elsewhere in the act, is two years. Surely they are too late with this "case" against Groia. It's also ironic given the law society's penchant for conflicts and sharp practice in prosecutions, even hiding decisions officially, using panel members on disicpline authorization committeess, uing bencher-directors as adjudicators and vice versa, etc., etc....
    When will the curtain finally come down on this wholly inadequate body and all of its own unprosecuted misconduct, admin law deficits, sharp practises and hidden debacles? We need a new Law Society of Ontrio.

SPECIAL REPORTS



Save

SUBSCRIBE TO LEGAL FEEDS

BY EMAIL

AWARDS

  • clawbies 2015
    clawbies 2014
  • clawbies 2013
    clawbies 2012
  • clawbies 2011
    clawbies 2010

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT