Skip to content

Changes to accident benefits in Ontario may significantly reduce benefits

|Written By Jennifer Brown

Accident victims in Ontario who suffer severe brain injuries or paralysis may find they no longer qualify for catastrophic coverage as the Ontario government looks to implement another round of cuts to auto insurance benefits, this time cutting coverage for devastating injuries.

Groups concerned about the rights of accident victims have come together to oppose the changes. (Photo: Shutterstock)

“There’s a really large concern about what injured persons are going to be able to access,” says Maria Capulong with Carranza LLP in Toronto. “There were already changes made as of Sept. 1, 2010, and now we’re looking at what appears to be another potential clawback on what injured people are going to be able to access.

“Whereas someone with non-catastrophic injuries has access to up to $100,000 limit on accident benefits that was scaled to $50,000 and now the definition of catastrophic is being narrowed and a lot of persons with serious injuries won’t be able to meet that definition and will be capped at $50,000.”

Capulong’s firm was involved in the case of Aviva Canada Inc. v Pastore in which Anna Pastore suffered a several ankle injury in a car accident and also sustained serious psychological impairments, including a recognized pain disorder.

And in December 2011 the Ontario Court of Appeal restored clarity on when catastrophic impairment should be considered for accident victims stating psychological and physical should be combined for the determination. The case involved Robert Kusnierz who suffered serious physical injuries in a 2001 car accident, including a below-knee amputation. He also suffered from psychological problems including depression. The Court of Appeal found the judge at Kusnierz’ 2010 trial against his insurance company, The Economical Mutual Insurance Co., erred when he concluded that Kusnierz’ psychological impairments should not be combined with his physical impairments, and that Kusnierz had therefore not sustained a catastrophic impairment.

Currently, accident victims who are deemed to have suffered a catastrophic injury are eligible for basic medical and rehabilitation benefits of up to $1 million. But if the province accepts the recommendations of an expert panel being tabled today (read report here), the catastrophic injury threshold will be raised significantly.

This will result in far fewer accident victims qualifying for catastrophic injury benefits. Those denied under the proposed new rules will instead be eligible for a maximum of $50,000 in basic benefits.

“The definition of catastrophic used to include the combination of psychological and physical impairments and they are trying to get rid of that,” says Capulong. “I think a lot of the general public aren’t aware of this.”

“We estimate that the number of cases deemed catastrophic will be reduced by half if these changes are implemented,” said Andrew Murray, president of the Ontario Trial Lawyers Association, in a statement issued today.

The OTLA, Alliance of Community Medical and Rehabilitation Providers, and Ontario Safety League are holding a press conference at Queen’s Park today to put out their message that the Ontario government is about to implement another round of cuts to auto insurance benefits.

Update: 1:36 pm added link to task force report on definition of catastrophic impairment in the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule.

  • Sam Esh
    I am going through a motor vehicle accident lawyer in Edmonton. I'm just wondering why the government would change this stuff? Was it effecting them? Did they really think out of all the problems the world is facing changing the definition of catastrophic accidents was one of the most important?
  • car accident lawyer
    Yeah! i also get to know that. The new SABS defines a minor injury as a "sprain, strain, whiplash associated disorder, contusion, abrasion, laceration or subluxation and any clinically associated sequelae", this last meaning any symptoms that are associated with these injuries. The FSCO introduced the MIG as transitional, though it remains to be seen what eventual changes await victims of car accidents in Ontario.
  • Henry
    What's with all the whining and BS?
    The provincial governement sets the rules. There were issues with the CAT Definition that they have now outlined how they will fix it.

    All this Alarmist CRAP is what gives the legal profession a big black eye! Especially the personal injury bar.

    STOP THE LIES!
  • caroline
    we pay big dollars for insurance .we should be given the chanch to pay extra or say no thanks . and get insurance else where , with better benefits . what is this government coming too . just ripping the poor man off . got to get ont and harper out of this government and stop cutting health care. jobs . etc . its a big fat joke .
  • Northern Seagull
    WTF has the Ontario government got to do with setting payouts by the insurance industry?

    Sounds like another sweetheart deal between the Dalton Gang and the Insurance Industry just like the Feds have done for the Banks
  • Henry
    The limits availabe are not changing - It's still $1M for CAT injuries!

SPECIAL REPORTS



Save

SUBSCRIBE TO LEGAL FEEDS

BY EMAIL

AWARDS

  • clawbies 2015
    clawbies 2014
  • clawbies 2013
    clawbies 2012
  • clawbies 2011
    clawbies 2010

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT