Skip to content

Ontario real estate lawyers must sign declaration

|Written By Yamri Taddese

Lawyers who act in real estate transactions will now be required to sign a declaration at the end of each year to confirm they know how to avoid becoming a victim of mortgage and real estate fraud.

The LSUC is targeting real estate lawyers in this way, because fraudsters are targeting them too, says Alan Silverstein.

The Law Society of Upper Canada’s Convocation approved the declaration yesterday. The document is a list of fraud-proof practices lawyers are expected to know and exercise.

The move is another attempt at curbing the high number of mortgage and real estate fraud claims the law society sees every year. Investigating these claims takes longer and requires significantly more resources, says the law society. In addition, lawyers involved in such cases have said they were not aware of some of their responsibilities.

Not allowing staff to use a lawyer’s Teranet diskette and keeping its password private is the first statement of the declaration. Effective this year, lawyers will also confirm they are aware of their duty to supervise all non-lawyers who worked for them. As well, they will check off a statement saying they know they’re not allowed to act for both a borrower and a lender in the transfer of title to property except in limited circumstances.

According to the law society’s professional regulation committee, real estate practice generated 20.1 per cent of all complaints between 2006 and 2011. Such complaints also comprised 29 per cent of all reported claims LawPRO received from 2000 to 2011.

There was some dissent in Convocation about singling out the real estate bar for the new requirement, but the majority of benchers agreed the declaration is needed.

“The reason why we’re targeting the real estate bar is because the fraudsters are also targeting it,” said Bencher Alan Silverstein, who supported the motion. He emphasized that many real estate lawyers don’t realize the Teranet diskette is their “electronic signature” instead of merely a way of accessing a program.

Lawyers whose employees acted inappropriately in real estate transactions will be held liable by the law society for “failing to be on guard against being duped by unscrupulous persons.”

  • Helen
    clearly this is aimed at curbing the high number of mortgage and real estate fraud claims. Does this high standard also apply to municipality in house lawyers who NEVER engage in mortgage transactions and whose law clerks are long term trusted employees of the corporation?
  • RONALD GREENSPAN, Q.
    I have a question, rather than a comment.
    How do the banks manage to use Teraview when mortgaging properties for their customers in view of the requirement that the completion and release must be signed by a lawyer using his/her diskette or USB key?
    And is the A&D expalined to the customer by a person with legal knowledge, that is, a lawyer, or is it explained by a lawyer's assistant, or not at all.
    The Teraview system is excellent for many reasons, but the above 2 situations can result in clients not being made properly aware of what they are signing and the legal situation they are becoming involved in.
  • Marlon
    Way to go Alan! This is long overdue.

SPECIAL REPORTS



Save

SUBSCRIBE TO LEGAL FEEDS

BY EMAIL

AWARDS

  • clawbies 2015
    clawbies 2014
  • clawbies 2013
    clawbies 2012
  • clawbies 2011
    clawbies 2010

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT