Skip to content

Manitoba law school calls for action on TWU covenant

|Written By Zachary Pedersen

The Faculty of Law at the University of Manitoba is requesting Trinity Western University amend its community covenant, and that the Law Society of Manitoba conduct a public consultation regarding accreditation of potential TWU graduates in the province.

TWU’s covenant, which is at the centre of the controversy surrounding the faith-based institution’s proposed law school, requires students, staff and faculty to pledge they will abstain from “sexual intimacy that violates the sacredness of marriage between a man and woman.”

U of M’s law faculty denounces that requirement.

“The Faculty of Law acknowledges the history of discrimination in legal education and barriers to the legal profession on grounds such as gender, race, religion, disability, and sexual orientation, and regrets that such discrimination continues to exist in some forms,” reads a motion approved by the council on April 10.

“In this context, Faculty Council respectfully requests that TWU eliminate discriminatory language and content from its community covenant that constitutes discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and marital status. It will result in a disproportionate reduction in available law school admissions spaces for groups excluded on the bases of sexual orientation and/or marital status and it gives rise to the possibility that a student could be expelled from the law school on discriminatory grounds.”

The motion has been forward to TWU, the LSM, and the Federation of Law Societies of Canada, which granted the school preliminary approval in December 2013.

Each law society in Canada determines the licensing criteria for lawyers within its own jurisdiction. Some law societies, including the LSM, entrusted the FLSC with the authority to approve undergraduate law degree programs that qualify graduates to enter a bar admission course within their regions.

U of M argues, however, that Manitoba’s law society did not “delegate its overarching mandate to regulate the legal profession in the public interest.”

As a result, it is calling on the LSM to “conduct an open, transparent consultation, consistent with its public interest mandate, Charter values, and the laws of Manitoba to consider whether to accredit the TWU law program for purposes of admission to the practice of law in Manitoba (and relatedly, whether to revoke its delegation to the FLSC).”

The LSM has also received a petition from U of M students and a group of lawyers, totalling approximately 200 people. It urges the LSM to find that accrediting TWU is not in the public interest, according to law society CEO Allan Fineblit.

The LSM will be addressing the issue at its May 22 meeting.

Last Friday, the Law Society of British Columbia approved TWU’s law program. The Law Society of Upper Canada debated the issue the day before and will vote on whether to accredit TWU law grads on Apr. 24. The next day, the Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society will vote on the issue, and the Law Society of New Brunswick takes it on Apr. 27.

  • RE: Manitoba law school calls for action on TWU covenant

    James R. Halifax
    I don't think the issue was sexual intimacy as much as the issue was "between a man and woman"

    You would think by now that folks would have caught on that all major religions oppose homosexuality. If you don't like the rules of the club...don't join it.

    Same for gay lawyers-in-waiting. If you don't want to sign the pledge....pick another school.

    personally, I think the pledge is silly, but then again, I'm not being forced to join the church, and I'm sure many students at the school have "lapsed" in that pledge in any event.
  • RE: Manitoba law school calls for action on TWU covenant

    Gerry Laarakker
    " “sexual intimacy that violates the sacredness of marriage between a man and woman.”"

    I don't know what that means. Surely that statement is void for vagueness.
  • RE: Manitoba law school calls for action on TWU covenant

    James H Halifax
    Apparetnly,

    guilty before presumed innocent has becomee the NORM for some in the legal profession.

    No one wants to wait and see if the graduates of the program are actually going to be good, or great lawyers; as apparently, something else is far more importatnt.

    If you are not a member of the "groupthink" community which has become the Canadian standard for lawyers....you are unworthy.

    I guess we shouldn't be surprised. When the Supreme court decreed that "truth is no longer a defence".....it was just the continued debasement of real human rights.

    It's all about how you "feel" now.....fairness be damned.

SPECIAL REPORTS



Save

SUBSCRIBE TO LEGAL FEEDS

BY EMAIL

AWARDS

  • clawbies 2015
    clawbies 2014
  • clawbies 2013
    clawbies 2012
  • clawbies 2011
    clawbies 2010