Traditionally, if a person wanted to sue someone in Ontario and that amount fell under $25,000, he or she would have to prepare all the necessary documents and then take the time to go to small claims court to file them.
As of last week, the court has finally entered the Internet era, as the Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General announced all small claims can now be filed online.
Brendan Crawley, a spokesperson for the AG, explained that since small claims court online applications were piloted online in 2014, more than "20,000 small claims have been filed online, and over 15 per cent of those claims were filed outside regular court hours.”
Crawley adds that the process is made secure by requiring “users to create and use a One-key ID and password, a unique electronic credential that allows users to communicate securely with online Government services.”
Why is the Ministry of Attorney General doing this now?
Crawley said that this was done to make “court services easier, faster and more accessible by delivering them online”.
“The intention has always been to expand it [the e-filing system],” adding that “filing online is really an advanced feature and it’s overdue, it should be expanded beyond small claims to all courts," says Toronto commercial and franchise litigator Ben Hanuka, of Law Works PC.
There will also be actual cost savings to clients if a lawyer or paralegal represents them, because they can now save on having to use a process server.
While Hanuka acknowledges, “It’s a good step . . . this saving of time for the consumer is good,” he also cautions that just because the filing is made easier, doesn’t mean the rest of the claim will be easy to handle.
“I think it will help them [consumers] with the logistics of filing it but it won’t do anything about helping them draft the claim and the drafting is the hard part," he says.
Before individuals begin filing, there are a few things they will need, including a ServiceOntario account, a credit card, a summary of why they are making the claim, and documents that support the claim.
What about people who are not exactly technologically savvy? Are they able to navigate the murky waters of online filing?
Crawley says the process is actually quite simple.
“The online filing wizard makes the process of completing and filing a small claim and receiving a judgment faster and more accessible by breaking it down into a series of easy-to-follow steps," he says.
The takeaway from the government’s announcement is that Canadian governments and courts are recognizing that they have to move with the times and many are now moving towards filing claims online.
The Canadian Bar Association-British Columbia branch’s Rural Education and Access to Lawyer Initiative program is getting creative when it comes to placing students in small or rural areas where there is an acute need for lawyers.
|In some rural areas of B.C. there’s only one lawyer for every 10,000 residents. (Image: Shutterstock)|
The difficulty faced by programs such as REAL and articling students wanting to practise in small towns is that many of the existing lawyers in underserved smaller or rural areas have moved into semi-retirement as the greying of the bar gains momentum.
“They are winding down their practice for whatever reason,” she says.
The average age of B.C. lawyers is approximately 50, according to REAL.
“But in smaller communities and rural areas, the age is significantly higher with the average age in many communities in the 60s (with some as high as 70 years old),” a fact sheet points out.
McCue says the Law Society of British Columbia requires students have full-time supervision. One way to ensure that, but work within the reality of the demographics occurring in communities, is to find lawyers willing to share a student. McCue says she is also open to hearing from lawyers who want to share a third-year student looking to article so she can help in bringing those lawyers together.
Annother scenario ripe for student sharing is where one lawyer does mainly litigation while another is a solicitor and each party might not feel they are giving a student the well-rounded practical experience a student should have.
“But, we put them together, it is a marriage made in heaven,” she says.
There are approximately 11,000 B.C. practising lawyers in the province but 86 per cent are located in Victoria, Vancouver, and New Westminster. The REAL program has produced a list of B.C. communities considered high-need and requiring lawyers.
LSBC statistics estimate there is one lawyer for every 450 people on average in the province. But, in smaller or rural communities that figure is one lawyer for every 1,000 persons.
The REAL program’s high-need list of communities (available here) includes towns where there is less than one lawyer per 1,000 residents. McCue says in some communities, the figures can be as low as one lawyer for 10,000 people.
McCue said that the REAL program focuses on second year students, providing funding for lawyers to take on the students; however it can provide information and support for third year students looking to article in a smaller non-urban area as well.
McCue encourages first-year students to visit smaller communities in need of lawyers so they have an idea of the lifestyle and opportunities that such a community can offer.
She encourages second-year students, and articling students, to also visit communities and talk to members of the legal community there. She says often rural lawyers want to meet students in person before hiring them to determine if they will fit into the firm.
She says over time, the REAL program has become more selective in its choice of candidates as is now focusing on retention rather than simply placement because of the growing need to provide lawyers in these high-need areas.
A total of 100 students have been placed since the program began but not all have stayed in smaller communities.
|Senator Mike Duffy leaves the courthouse after being cleared of bribery and fraud charges. (Photo: Chris Wattie/Reuters)|
Duffy, a former television journalist, had faced 31 criminal charges related to roughly $90,000 in expenses he charged after former Conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper appointed him to the Senate, the upper chamber of Parliament, in late 2008.
The trial started last August, shortly after Harper had launched an election campaign.
The court heard that Harper's chief of staff, Nigel Wright, had pressed Duffy to repay the expenses, even though Wright felt they were most likely legal. Evidence also showed Harper's team had given orders to the Senate, which is supposed to be independent.
Duffy chose to be tried without a jury. In a 308-page ruling, Ontario Court Judge Charles Vaillancourt said he found the senator to be a credible witness and strongly criticized Harper's aides for their behavior.
As the case progressed amid enormous media coverage last year, polls showed the Conservatives starting to lose support. Justin Trudeau's Liberals won a majority in the federal election on Oct. 19.
The Barreau du Québec has added its voice to a growing chorus of legal groups calling for more public funding and radical reforms to help reduce what they say are ridiculously long court delays that are hindering access to and making a public mockery of the province’s court system, particularly in regards to criminal justice.
|Claudia Prémont notes delays and budget cuts are ‘bad news for the administration of justice’ in Quebec.|
She goes on to list a series of complaints, ranging from delays of up to three years for criminal trials to be heard in Montreal at the Superior Court level, and two years in Quebec Court.
The barreau said those delays, together with a recent $5-million cut in the budget of Quebec’s Directeur des poursuites criminelles et pénales office “spells bad news for the administration of justice.”
The Quebec bar is notably calling on the Liberal provincial government to provide the necessary resources (i.e. a big cheque) to Justice Minister Stéphanie Vallée that will permit her “to remedy this problematic.”
The barreau’s public sortie comes just days after the former head of the Superior Court of Quebec, Justice François Rolland, made headlines for slamming the trial delays in the province’s court system in a Senate hearing in Ottawa.
The former chief justice notably decried the fact that criminal cases by jury are currently being scheduled for 2019.
“Delays are bad for the accused, extremely bad for the victims, and extremely bad for Canadian society and the credibility of our judiciary,” Rolland told the committee, which is examining questions related to court delays and their effects on penal justice across the country.
According to Rolland, changes have to be made to make delays more reasonable like they were before 2009, the year Quebec started invoking mega trials to deal with biker gangs.
“If we don’t do anything we are going to hit a wall, and once that happens we can’t back up,” he said.
Rolland added that when he joined the bench in 2004, jury trials were always set within a year, usually seven to nine months.
“At the time I’m saying this,” he said, “you can’t get a [Superior Court of Quebec] date for a trial set in Montreal before 2017. For 2018, there are a few dates available, and they’re already booking dates in 2019. The situation is similar in Quebec City.”
In addition to the mega trials, he said the rising use of electronic communication of evidence, increased resources in police investigations, and even the increase in Crown attorney hirings have created a massive uptake in demand that the static numbers of judges and courtrooms can’t handle or accommodate.
A few weeks ago, another judge, Quebec Court Judge René De La Sablonnière, also made headlines for a pilot project he’s instigated that aims to reduce delays in criminal court cases.
Calling delays “the cancer of the judicial system,” De la Sablonnière pointed to a sexual touching case he threw out in March, nearly four years after charges were laid.
“These delays erode witnesses’ memories of events, unfairly prolong preventative detention of accuseds, and undermine the credibility and legitimacy of the institution,” the judge told Quebec City’s Le Soleil.
He gave the interview to publicize a pilot project that he and Crown prosecutor Sabin Ouellet have teamed up on.
The unique Quebec-first project aims to increase the number of negotiated settlements in cases by four per cent a year.
Currently, 93 per cent of the 6,600 criminal cases that are opened every year in Quebec are settled without a trial.
In roughly half of those cases, guilty pleas are entered after several delays.
The judge says he and Ouellet plan to steal a page from British Columbia’s approach, in which accused are offered the most lenient punishments possible in exchange for a guilty plea, and given 120 days to consider it.
The Supreme Court of Canada today struck down two so-called tough-on-crime measures introduced by the former Conservative government, ruling the changes to sentencing practices were unconstitutional.
|The SCC struck down two Harper-era tough-on-crime laws.|
Mandatory minimum sentences for non-violent drug offenders were enacted in 2012, part of changes to the criminal law made by the Conservatives.
“The reality is this: mandatory minimum sentence provisions that apply to offences that can be committed in various ways, under a broad array of circumstances and by a wide range of people are constitutionally vulnerable. This is because such provisions will almost inevitably include an acceptable reasonable hypothetical for which the mandatory minimum will be found unconstitutional,” said the majority ruling written by Chief Justice Beverly McLachlin for justices Rosalie Abella, Thomas Cromwell, Michael Moldaver, Andromache Karakatsanis, and Suzanne Côté”
“If Parliament hopes to maintain mandatory minimum sentences for offences that cast a wide net, it should consider narrowing their reach so that they only catch offenders that merit that mandatory minimum sentences. In the alternative, Parliament could provide for judicial discretion to allow for a lesser sentence where the mandatory minimum would be grossly disproportionate and would constitute cruel and unusual punishment,” said the majority.
In the second case, R. v. Safarzadeh‑Markhali, the court voted unanimously against denying enhanced credit for pre-sentence time spent in custody to those that had been denied bail primarily due to a prior conviction.
Reforms in 2009 made those that had been denied bail primarily because of a previous conviction ineligible for enhanced credit, limiting the credit for pre-sentence time served to a one-to-one basis, rather than one-and-a-half days.
The court ruled that the denial of enhanced credit was overly broad.
“The denial of enhanced credit for pre-sentence custody to offenders who are denied bail primarily because of a prior conviction is overbroad because it catches people in ways that have nothing to do with the legislative purpose of s. 719(3.1) of the Code, which is to enhance public safety and security. Section 719(3.1) thus violates s. 7 of the Charter,” said the unanimous ruling, also penned by McLachlin.
NEW YORK — The complex duties of today’s corporate counsel can be such a tightrope act — carefully walking among the board, the CEO and the law — that it’s surprising leotards and long balance poles aren’t given as part of the employment package.
|'There has been a revolution of GC’s role within their companies that has transformed both law and business,' says Ben Heineman. (Photo: Gregg Wirth)|
“There has been a revolution of GC’s role within their companies that has transformed both law and business,” said Heineman.
His comments came at an event sponsored by Thomson Reuters and the Harvard Law School, highlighting the public launch of his new book, The Inside Counsel Revolution: Resolving the Partner-Guardian Tension, published by the American Bar Association.
Indeed, the four main framework ideas Heineman described are not some dry, guiding principles; rather, they are the bedrock on which all day-to-day activities and interactions in the corporate legal department should be built. The four framework ideas for GCs include:
1. Fusing together high performance, high integrity, and sound risk management
Heineman said that successfully fusing these elements together at the corporate level not only mitigates risk but also achieves positive benefits within the company, the marketplace, and broader society. Think of it as a “corporation-specific optimization” that creates value for key stakeholders — from shareholders to employees and customers.
2. Becoming the needed lawyer/statesman
Today’s GCs are expected to be outstanding legal experts, wise counselors, and accountable leaders for the company, said Heineman, but that has to be balanced with a strict responsibility to the higher tenants of the law. “The first question should always be, ‘Is it legal?’” he said. “And the last should always be, ‘Is it right?’”
3. Resolving the partner/guardian tension
This is where the tightrope walk gets really tricky. GCs have to balance their duties to the company as an employee and stakeholder with their duty to guard the company from any legal missteps that could damage it. Heineman pointed out that GCs battle a lot of negative perceptions in this area, and attitudes about “company lawyers” as naysayers, being overly cautious, and hurting business are common and must be battled back. “As a GC, you owe it to the board to speak up, even though that may put you cross-ways with your CEO.”
4. Creating and maintaining an ‘integrity culture’
Heineman described this framework idea as one of the most important. The ability to articulate and define shared principles and practices throughout not only the corporate legal department but the company as a whole is vital, he explained, and management walking the walk is key. “It is this culture that will influence how people will feel, think and work,” he explained. “But the leaders have to live it.”
Heineman said instilling these framework ideas within a company have become more important — and more possible — as general counsel have become more “sophisticated, capable, and influential” within a company.
“They are now a core member of top management, participating in discussions beyond risk and the law, to include opportunities and business development,” he said.
Submissions are open for the third edition of the TrustLaw Index of Pro Bono, the world’s leading global pro bono survey.
|Law firms are invited to submit their pro bono data through an online survey before May 23.|
“Pro bono data matters,” says Serena Grant, the director of TrustLaw, a part of the Thomson Reuters Foundation. “This is the feedback we have received from firms large and small — whether used by a pro bono co-ordinator to advocate for better resources or a firm setting up its pro bono practice and wanting benchmarks on how their counterparts have structured their practices.”
The Thomson Reuters Foundation launched the TrustLaw Index of Pro Bono in 2014 to provide analysis on the key national, regional, and global trends shaping the pro bono marketplace, and to assess the pro bono participation of law firms on a country by country basis.
“Acclaimed pro bono surveys have long collected data on a national basis in markets such as England and Wales, the U.S., Australia and even in parts of Latin America. Yet, there was not a comprehensive report mapping trends and measuring pro bono engagement on a global basis until we created the TrustLaw Index of Pro Bono,” adds Grant.
In Canada, Canadian Lawyer conducted the first survey of pro bono activity in this country in 2014.
Its unique global reach allows the TrustLaw Index of Pro Bono to unearth relevant, yet previously unexplored trends in pro bono markets from Cambodia to Germany to Colombia, highlighting successful programs as well as identifying gaps in pro bono participation.
“Since different cultures and jurisdictions hold diverse attitudes to pro bono, we created a definition of pro bono that allows for consistent submissions globally, and that enables comparison across the findings,” explains Grant.
The TrustLaw Index of Pro Bono also recognizes the role of local law firms in advancing pro bono, especially in jurisdictions such as India, which restrict the operation of foreign law firms.
The findings challenge the conventional notion that international law firms are better resourced to commit to pro bono practices. Rather, the TrustLaw Index of Pro Bono is a platform where firms of all shapes and sizes can share their experience and expertise.
The 2015 findings unveil an incredible enthusiasm for pro bono with 2 million hours of free legal support provided by the 140 respondent firms across 76 countries, and an average of 43 hours of free legal assistance invested annually by individual lawyers.
In Canada, the Index reported that fee-earners at respondent firms on average performed 14.8 hours of pro bono work in 2015. The Index compared Canadian firms with other firms across the Americas (though excluding the U.S. given the very significant resources devoted to pro bono there) and found that Canadian lawyers performed broadly the same amount of pro bono on average to their colleagues throughout the region (14.8 hours compared to a regional average of 14.6).
It is well known that Canadian lawyers have worked to promote access to justice through both legal aid and pro bono work for many years, and this has generally been conducted at a provincial level. In recent years, however, with the founding of Pro Bono Canada in 2012, pro bono in the country has become more organized on a national scale.
This year’s Index aims to explore this trend further, welcoming feedback from Canadian law firms on their pro bono service to build a more comprehensive picture of the country’s pro bono landscape. Law firms are invited to submit their pro bono data through an online survey before May 23.
“More and more around the world, barriers to pro bono are falling, participation is up, and lawyers are excited to make a difference in their jurisdictions and beyond. This sea change is happening in no small part thanks to the TrustLaw Index of Pro Bono. It is an aspirational tool for us to gauge how we’re doing, and inspires us to do more,” says Louis O’Neill, pro bono counsel at White & Case LLP, in anticipation of the 2016 TrustLaw Index of Pro Bono.
Findings of the 2016 TrustLaw Index of Pro Bono will be launched July 18.
Vancouver’s Battle of the Bar Bands will feature an officially recorded lawyer band on stage June 10 at the Vancouver Commodore Ballroom.
|The Disclaimers will be one of the bands taking to the stage to raise money on June 10.|
“While we try to do original songs,” says Haberl, who will be on stage, “The reality is that is a party venue and those attending are waiting to hear well-known music. So, I try not to overload with original material.”
The battle of the bands sells out each year and annually raises $100,000 for the B.C. branch of the Canadian Bar Association’s Benevolent Society, for a total of about $1.5 million over the event’s 15 year history.
This year’s event will feature eight bands: the Disclaimers, Chris Jackson Band, the Crumbling Skulls, House Arrest, Standard of Hair, Still Living at Home, and TOAD (Too Old and Difficult). The judges will ber a mix of lawyers with musical backgrounds, members of the judiciary, and media. This year’s media judges include radio and TV personality Vicki Gabereau and CBC radio’s Rick Cluff, who will also serve as emcee.
Stephanie Hacksel, a partner in ZSA Legal Recruitment which is the chief sponsor and provides winning cups, says good support is derived from Vancouver’s legal community with law firms making donations.
There are three cups given out each year, she says. The winning band captures the coveted top trophy cup for best band, while cups are also given out honoring the legal firm and non-legal firm that made the largest donation.
Singleton Urquhart lawyer Roger Holland, who has been involved with the event since it began and is a member of the Benevolent Society’s board, says this year’s line-up of bands included old favourites but also three newer bands, one a newly-formed group out of Surrey.
The new bands add to the competitive nature of the event and make it harder to predict a winner, he says.
“I give the judges suggested criteria for the bands such as originality, performance, and crowd response,” says Holland. The judges then rate the bands on points. Each band is made up of 80 per cent lawyers or members of a law firm.
Holland says the Battle of the Bar Bands has two objectives.
“The first is to raise money for the CBABC Benevolent Society,” he says. “The second is to provide once a year an entertaining evening for the audience who turn out.”
He says the battle is a great outlet for the legal community’s creative musicians. Many have played in bands or still play in bands professionally, he says, but there are also those who are “pretty darn good and could have played in bands professionally.”
The CBABC Benevolent Society is a provider of last recourse, says Holland, as each year it provides money to lawyers whose insurance may not cover costs of a medical or personal emergency or tragedy.
Holland says there have been “horrific” stories of illness and events that have affected lawyers, such as dealing with a child with a rare disease or needing financial support for medical services.
“We routinely provide grants to a lot of deserving people,” says Holland. “We have people who fall between the cracks and this is a way for lawyers to take care of their own.”
Tickets for the event can also be purchased on an individual basis ($35 for non-lawyers and $75 for lawyers) as well.
Royal Bank of Canada said on Monday it had controls in place to prevent illegal activities after documents allegedly showed it had regularly used the services of a Panama-based law firm at the center of a massive data leak exposing possible tax evasion.
|(Photo: Mark Blinch/Reuters)|
RBC and its subsidiaries were associated with 378 shell companies registered in the Mossack Fonseca data, the Toronto Star newspaper reported.
In an emailed statement on Monday, RBC said that it worked within the legal and regulatory framework of every country in which it operates and had an extensive due diligence process to understand what its clients intentions are.
"Tax evasion is illegal, and we have established controls, policies and procedures in place to detect it and prevent it occurring through RBC," the bank said.
RBC said there were a number of legitimate reasons for clients to set up a holding company.
"If we have reason to believe a client is seeking to commit a criminal offence by evading taxes, we would report the offence and not do business with the client," it added.
An Ontario judge on Thursday found former Canadian radio host Jian Ghomeshi not guilty on four sexual assault charges and one count of choking in a high-profile case that stoked a public discussion on celebrity and consent.
|Jian Ghomeshi leaves court with his lawyer Marie Henein the not guilty verdict on four sexual assault charges and one count of choking. (Photo: Jenna Marie Wakani/Reuters)|
Ghomeshi, 48, did not testify in response to three women who told the court that he hit them, pulled their hair, or choked them during intimacy.
In a 2014 Facebook post after being fired by the CBC for “consistently” breaching behavior standards, Ghomeshi admitted that he participates in rough sex, including bondage and discipline, but only with the consent of his partner.
After spending about 90 minutes reading his judgment, Ontario Court Justice William Horkins said inconsistencies in the testimony of the three complainants meant the charges could not be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
“The evidence of each complainant suffered not just from inconsistencies and questionable behavior, but was tainted by outright deception,” Horkins said in his decision.
However, he did note near the end of the ruling: “My conclusion that the evidence in this case raises a reasonable doubt is not the same as deciding in any positive way that these events never happened. At the end of this trial, a reasonable doubt exists because it is impossible to determine, with any acceptable degree of certainty or comfort, what is true and what is false.”
The two-week trial in February stirred up anger among feminists and victims’ rights advocates, who said the three women were attacked on the witness stand. Protesters gathered at the downtown Toronto courtroom on Thursday, chanting that they believed the women.
Social media debate roared on hashtags #Ghomeshi and #ibelievesurvivors after the verdict was announced, while protesters gathered at the downtown Toronto courtroom chanting that they believed the women. One woman was arrested after she charged the front steps of the courthouse, topless, as the prosecutor spoke to media.
Prosecutor Michael Callaghan said his office would consider its options after studying the verdict.
Ghomeshi and his lawyer declined to comment and avoided the protesters by leaving through a back door at the court. His sister Jila Ghomeshi told reporters the family would try to heal after more than a year of "punishment" delivered before due process.
Ghomeshi is scheduled to stand trial on a separate sexual assault charge in June.
Subscribe to Legal Feeds
- Patricia Cancilla
- David Dias
- Mallory Hendry
- Jennifer Brown
- Yamri Taddese
- Gabrielle Giroday
- Gail J. Cohen
- Jim Middlemiss
- Karen Lorimer