Roses are red
Violets are blue
The war on piracy
Will never be through

Additional Info

  • Subtitle The IT Girl
Published in Web exclusive content
The fair dealing provisions of bill C-11 still need clarification. Photo: Shutterstock
Canada’s universities are urging swift passage of bill C-11, the copyright modernization act, which was sent to committee this week for review, but critics say there is still work to be done in the area of fair dealing.

Additional Info

  • Subtitle
Published in Latest News
The Supreme Court has made the difficult-to-deal-with standard of review easier, says one lawyer.
The Supreme Court has upheld the decision of an Alberta privacy commission adjudicator in a case that challenged the timeline for the standard of review when dealing with a complaint.

Additional Info

  • Subtitle
Published in Latest News
Illustration: Scott Page
My mother used to chastise me as a teenager when I got cocky, warning me never to get too big for my britches. Basically, it was an ego check. She was reminding me not to be conceited and show an exaggerated sense of my own importance.

Additional Info

  • Subtitle Back Page
Published in Commentary

Properly managing legal spending remains the top concern for leaders of Canadian legal departments, as they try to strike a balance between what they spend and what they get in return.

Additional Info

  • Subtitle Cover story - Sixth annual InHouse/Association of Corporate Counsel roundtable
Published in InHouse Cover Story
Technology has opened up a wealth of information for lawyers conducting investigations through surveillance for use in court cases, but they need to make sure the collecting of such information is within the bounds of Canada’s privacy rules, experts at a Toronto seminar said last week.
Surveillance is treated like all types of evidence in court, said David Cherepacha, a partner at Davies Howe LLP, who was speaking at a seminar organized by his firm and the Association of Corporate Counsel. And even though gathering the information might violate Canada’s privacy legislation, the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act, it does not mean the evidence is not admissible in court, he added.
“Commencing a legal action implies consent under PIPEDA,” said Cherepacha.
Beyond traditional surveillance for which organizations or lawyers might hire professionals to obtain video evidence, the proliferation of social media like Facebook has added a whole new level. Ava Kanner, another partner at Davies Howe, told in-house lawyers in attendance several court decisions involving evidence taken from Facebook have weighed in trying to reach a balance between admitting evidence and protecting privacy.
While courts have ruled that the mere existence of a Facebook account is not enough to require its postings be produced in discovery, they have also ruled plaintiffs cannot have serious expectations of privacy when about 350 people are granted access to a private site, Kanner said in her presentation. She gave examples from one of her own cases that saw a Newmarket, Ont. man lose a court case involving a disability claim, when photos on Facebook showed he was involved in heavy physical activity with his family.
Beyond Facebook, getting information when a hard drive is involved, for example when an employer wants to access private of activity of an employer, is something courts have also looked at. “It’s not a certainty that you will get access,” said Kanner. “You have to convince a judge it is relevant and reasonable to privacy.”
Jodi L. Skeates, legal counsel with the Canadian Life and Health Insurance Association Inc., said organizations should craft defensive strategies that allow for corporate responsibility in the appropriate use of surveillance. She said surveillance is governed by a series of regulations, ranging from rules of evidence and civil procedure to employment contracts and privacy laws.
PIPEDA is key, but it doesn’t cover all aspects of surveillance, said Skeates. It  applies to organizations that collect, use, or disclose personal information in the course of commercial activities, she said, and also to the personal information about employees of organizations engaged in federal works, undertakings, or business.
Skeates said in-house lawyers should be careful to closely follow proposed regulatory reform in this area, adding the Privacy Commissioner of Canada has been very public in wanting order-making powers, penalties for non-compliance, and the ability to publish the names of the organizations under investigation.
‘Commencing a legal action implies consent under PIPEDA,’ says David Cherepacha. Photo: Andi Balla
Technology has opened up a wealth of information for lawyers conducting investigations through surveillance for use in court cases, but they need to make sure the collecting of such information is within the bounds of Canada’s privacy rules, experts at a Toronto seminar said last week.

Additional Info

  • Subtitle
Published in Latest News
Do you remember the first time someone read your most personal journal? I do. And I stopped keeping them after that. It feels like such a betrayal, not to mention a terrible invasion of privacy. Right? So what about when your credit card company or bank suddenly wants to replace your credit or bank card because your information might have been appropriated by a third party? Or your hydro company sends out a polite letter saying not to worry but just in case, they have to let you know that there might have been a security breach. Did you feel the same way you felt the day you found out your journal or some other personal document had been read? I’m willing to bet not. So how does that work? A bank isn’t a person but because the person who read it is, somehow it matters more. Am I wrong?

Additional Info

  • Subtitle The IT Girl
Published in Web exclusive content
The Ontario Court of Appeal said the case posed a ‘knotty and interesting question.’ Photo: Gail J. Cohen
Banks should not share clients’ mortgage information without consent when asked by other financial institutions trying to collect on a judgment debt, ruled the Ontario Court of Appeal. Such disclosure would violate the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act.

Additional Info

  • Subtitle
Published in Latest News
You wouldn’t believe this, but I actually didn’t give a damn about Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, and other social network platforms until around April 27, 2009, when my niece in Calgary posted my mother’s untimely death as a very surprising status update on her Facebook page, having just heard about it from her sister in Victoria milliseconds before.

Additional Info

  • Subtitle Letter from Law Law Land
Published in Web exclusive content

The federal government’s long awaited introduction of a bill to amend the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act is a constructive step forward in keeping Canada’s private-sector privacy legislation up to date and responsive to the exigencies of technology and the modern marketplace.

 

Additional Info

  • Subtitle
Published in Web exclusive content
<< Start < Prev 1 2 Next > End >>
Page 1 of 2

Latest Videos

More Canadian Lawyer TV...

Digital Editions