Skip to content

McLachlin challenges profession to embrace innovation as CBA conference begins

|Written By Glenn Kauth

CALGARY — As the Canadian Bar Association conference got underway this morning, Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin opened with a keynote speech emphasizing the need to balance the pressing need to change the delivery of legal services with lawyers’ professional obligations.

‘If we are unable to revise ourselves, then we risk irrelevance,’ said incoming CBA president Janet Fuhrer.
“Flexibility and innovation, yes. Abandonment of core professional values, never,” said McLachlin in a speech aimed at addressing the challenges facing the legal profession due to rapidly changing technology and client demands for lower costs.

While McLachlin emphasized the need to protect core values, she made clear that resisting change isn’t an option.

“We’re part of it, and there’s no escape,” she said, referring to the technological changes making legal information available in other ways and players such as LegalZoom that are growing rapidly.

In her speech, McLachlin focused on the major challenges facing the legal profession while outlining what she sees as new opportunities that provide some optimism for different ways of doing business, particularly for “nimble, tech-savvy lawyers.”

“Legal systems everywhere are experience an access-to-justice crisis and are responding in different ways,” she said, suggesting Canada has done a good job of trying to address the issues by looking for ways to make legal services more accessible.

Efficiency and affordability, she added, will be key.

“The time-honoured legal phrase ‘with due deliberation’ has no place in the new world in which we live and practise,” she said.

She went on to  suggest lawyers will also have to consider a loosening of their dominance over the delivery of legal services to make room for other, cheaper offerings.

“In the age of the Internet, people are questioning why they, the consumers of legal product, should be forced to go to expensive lawyers working in expensive office buildings located in expensive urban centres. Why, they ask, should a client retain lawyers, when integrated professional firms can deliver accounting, financial and legal advice?” she said.

“The old assumptions are being questioned,” she added, noting the question isn’t whether there will be liberalization but how it will happen.

“We must not close our mind to the changes that are being increasingly forced on us.”

McLachlin spoke in Calgary as the CBA conference got underway with a significant focus on how lawyers with a focus on innovation and “building a better lawyer.” Sessions at the conference will cover topics such as innovation and the future of law firms as well as the role of things like bitcoin, Google Glass, and three-dimensional printing in the practice of law.

In her speech this morning, outgoing CBA president Michele Hollins touted the CBA’s role in helping lawyers adapt to the changes.

“It’s a great time to be talking about innovation in the legal profession but it’s an even better time to be leading that conversation,” she said.

The comments come as the CBA itself faces significant change as it considers its Rethink process aimed at reinvigorating the organization to make it more relevant to lawyers. It was a theme incoming president Janet Fuhrer emphasized in her remarks to the CBA council yesterday.

“Every aspect of what we do is on the table and under the microscope,” said Fuhrer, who called on lawyers to embrace the CBA’s Legal Futures, Equal Justice, and Rethink efforts underway. “If we are unable to revise ourselves, then we risk irrelevance.”

Despite those challenges, Hollins noted the CBA has continued to play a significant role.

“We have tackled issues in every corner of the law,” she said, citing the association’s significant submissions on Bill C-51. And with a federal election underway, she said, it would be playing a role in trying to raise the access-to-justice issues it has been focusing on during the campaign.

To that end, she announced a new Twitter hashtag, #whataboutalex, aimed at discussing Canadians’ experiences in the justice system and the challenges they face.

  • Lawyer

    Bradley Wright
    If the Chief Justice is exhorting the profession to innovate without selling its ownership, then I am with her all the way. Selling our ownership or any part of it is what we should never countenance. Companies like Legal Zoom can be dealt with; indeed, nothing stops the profession from doing something similar, but the best answer to the Legal Zooms of the world is an effective advertising campaign by the Law Society, paid for by the profession (less than $100 per lawyer), to educate the public as to why lawyers are a bargain compared to disclaimer infested non-advice. As to the harm of consolidation, see the US title insurance/conveyancing world: very high cost to the public, very lousy service to the public, and virtually no claims paid or title problems corrected. That's what non-legal ownership of legal services produces. A few benefit; everybody else loses. Shame on everyone who produced that result in the US. Let us be smarter in Canada.
  • Lawyer

    Bradley Wright
    With respect, what the Chief Justice and others do not seem to understand is that innovation in the context of ABS means only (1) increasing consolidation in the marketplace to the detriment of low-cost independent providers and their clients to the benefit of the few, and (2) loss of independence and standing of the legal profession (when you give up ownership, you give up independence, simple as that and nothing can prevent the loss). Further, they fail to realize that (1) every single benefit they extol can be achieved without selling our ownership, and (2) ABS does nothing about the one gigantic barrier to access to justice - the ruinous time and cost of litigation. ABS is a wholly unnecessary, wholly retrograde step that, in addition to being profoundly harmful, is, if stupidly adopted, irreversible. Those who embraced it too early and too publicly need to resile from that and work toward real solutions to real problems where the legal profession maintains its FULL independence.




  • clawbies 2015
    clawbies 2014
  • clawbies 2013
    clawbies 2012
  • clawbies 2011
    clawbies 2010