Skip to content

SCC denies former Ottawa U prof’s judicial bias appeal

|Written By Heather Gardiner

The Supreme Court of Canada today refused leave to appeal by former University of Ottawa physics professor Denis Rancourt who alleged judicial bias in a defamation suit between himself and Ottawa law professor Joanne St. Lewis.

St. Lewis sued Rancourt for defamation after he called her a “house negro” in a 2011 blog post that criticized St. Lewis’ findings about a report by the university’s Student Appeal Centre of the Student Federation regarding racism at the university.

University of Ottawa president Allan Rock had asked St. Lewis to evaluate the report. She found there was no systemic racism with the university’s procedures for academic fraud and concluded that the report’s findings were not factual.

During the court proceedings, university witnesses refused to answer certain questions or produce several documents. Rancourt challenged the refusals but the judge dismissed his motion.

Rancourt claimed the judge was biased because the university had a scholarship in honour of his late son and a boardroom named after him at Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, which represented the University of Ottawa. However, a second judge rejected his request for an order to set aside the previous decision.

Rancourt then sought to appeal both decisions, which was dismissed with costs by the Supreme Court of Canada on June 4.

Last week, a lengthy arbitration hearing to decide whether the university had the right to fire Rancourt in 2009 ended. The university’s board of governors let the tenured professor with 23 years’ experience go for reason of “academic fraud.” Rancourt reportedly awarded A+ marks to every student in an advanced physics course.

According to the Ottawa Citizen, the arbitrator’s ruling on the firing won’t be out for another few months.

  • RE: SCC denies former Ottawa U prof’s judicial bias appeal

    Is this really surprising?

    From reading his arguments, which he posted on one of his many blogs, it appears Mr. Rancourt wanted to appeal a pre-trial interlocutory motion to the SCC. As noted in the Ottawa Citizen and Legal Feeds, this case as not even gone to trial yet and Mr. Rancourt has been ordered to pay costs on numerous motions he's brought and lost.

    Its important to give self-represented litigants like Mr. Rancourt a bit of leeway and understanding when they present their arguments in court, even if they are way off base. But they still need to know and follow the same rules of procedure as everyone else. There were other procedurally correct ways for him to raise his concerns, but chose not to follow them. He should probably put his energies into figuring out how he is going to defend his deliberate and racially charged defamatory comments, rather than all these side issues.





  • clawbies 2015
    clawbies 2014
  • clawbies 2013
    clawbies 2012
  • clawbies 2011
    clawbies 2010