B.C. judges ponder next step in pay dispute

Provincial Court judges in British Columbia are considering their position after failing in their latest bid for more pay.

B.C. Supreme Court Justice John Savage has told the Provincial Court Judges’ Association of British Columbia its members must “share the burden” of economic austerity.

Savage dismissed a judicial review brought by the association after the B.C. Legislative Assembly in 2013 rejected the recommendations of an independent pay commission.

Provincial court judges in B.C. earned $234,600 in 2013, according to the March 3 decision.

The B.C. Judges Compensation Commission had recommended provincial judges’ pay should increase by six per cent in 2013-14, among other compensation enhancements. But the Legislative Assembly said salaries would have to be frozen for a third year running, due to budget constraints.

A judicial review decision last year forced the provincial government to reconsider its position, and it increased its offer to 1.5 per cent.

The association then launched a second judicial review, calling for an order:
•    quashing the Legislative Assembly’s 2013 response to the pay committee’s report
•    declaring the response did not meet the standard required by the Judicial Compensation Act and the constitutional principle of judicial independence, and
•    declaring the judges were entitled to the remuneration.

But Savage found two of the three disputed recommendations were rejected for legitimate reasons, including that the fiscal climate in 2013 was felt to be more difficult than the commission’s 2010 report had envisaged.

He said: “The theme here is one of temporary austerity in which members of the judiciary share some of the burdens of an adverse economic climate during the years in question, after receiving significant increases in prior years.

“The constitutional guarantee of a minimum acceptable level of judicial remuneration does not shield judges from sharing the burden of difficult economic times, to limit increases.”

Although the association’s petition was dismissed, it was “successful on the major procedural issue which bore on the entire analysis, and one of three substantive issues,” he added.

The association could challenge the decision by filing a notice of appeal within 30 days of the decision.

Association president Lisa Mrozinski says her organization is studying the decision, and that she cannot comment further at the moment.

The association’s lawyer Joseph Arvay says he is unable to comment at this time.

A B.C. Ministry of Justice spokeswoman confirmed costs were not being sought.

In an e-mailed statement, Minister Suzanne Anton said: “[The] government carefully reconsidered the 2010 Judicial Compensation Commission report and the Legislative Assembly unanimously supported [the] government’s response. The decision from the B.C. Supreme Court supports our position.”

Free newsletter

The Canadian Legal Newswire is a FREE weekly newsletter that keeps you up to date on news and analysis about the Canadian legal scene. A separate InHouse Edition is delivered every two weeks, providing targeted news and information of interest to in-house counsel.

Please complete the form below to receive the weekly Canadian Legal Newswire and/or the Canadian Inhouse Legal Newswire.

Recent articles & video

TrustLaw, Nextlaw team up in pro-bono boost

Gowling WLG says Brexit is informing large firms’ HQ choices

Major law firms pledge U$5 million for industry diversity

Ashurst hails "game changer hire" for project finance team

Beverley McLachlin bio provides insights into remarkable life and career

Supreme Court of Canada set to hear appeals in Winnipeg

Most Read Articles

California now has toughest law in U.S. for the collection of personal information

Supreme Court of Canada set to hear appeals in Winnipeg

Beverley McLachlin bio provides insights into remarkable life and career

Digital privacy evolves in class actions