B.C. lawyer to gather native views on energy issues

Prime Minister Stephen Harper has appointed British Columbia lawyer Doug Eyford to gather views of native groups across the Western province on energy development as the industry struggles to gain acceptance of multibillion-dollar pipelines that would vastly increase oil exports.

However, Eyford, Harper’s new representative for West Coast energy infrastructure, insisted on Tuesday his role will not be to cajole holdouts into supporting contentious projects.

Aboriginal opposition to such proposals as Enbridge Inc.’s $6-billion Northern Gateway pipeline has been a major stumbling block to the Harper Conservatives’ aim of shipping large volumes of oil sands-derived crude to the Pacific Coast to be exported to Asia as a way to increase returns.

Eyford, a partner at Eyford Macaulay Shaw & Padmanabhan LLP in Vancouver, is a veteran of federal negotiations with First Nations, on self-government. Over the next three months, he will meet with communities affected by proposed pipelines, liquefied natural gas plants, and marine terminals.

Eyford will issue a draft report to Harper on June 28 and the final document on Nov. 29, said Joe Oliver, Canada’s natural resources minister, in a speech in Terrace, B.C.

His appointment comes a day after Ottawa said it planned a series of measures aimed at improving tanker safety as proposed pipeline projects point to a major increase in coastal traffic.

Eyford said he has not been asked to advocate on behalf of the government or the energy industry in favour of specific industrial developments.

“My role and responsibility is to provide an accurate and complete report to the prime minister on what I’m told by the people who I interact and engage with as part of my responsibilities,” he said.

The federal government has a constitutional requirement to consult with and accommodate native communities when developments will affect their lands, and some aboriginal leaders have suggested their rights and title to lands may amount to veto power.

This has presented legal risks to proponents of Northern Gateway, which would ship 525,000 barrels a day of Alberta oil to the coastal port of Kitimat, B.C. Regulators are due to decide whether to approve the project by the end of this year following hearings that began at the beginning of 2012.

Oliver said native people have much to contribute to natural resource development, as they bring traditional knowledge that offers better understanding of environmental impacts and remediation measures. He pointed out that the industry supports 32,000 aboriginal jobs in Canada.

Still, some groups, such as the Coastal First Nations and Yinka Dene Alliance, are staunchly opposed to oil pipelines, saying they fear the risks of oil spills as well as potential loss of traditional ways.

British Columbia’s burgeoning LNG industry, however, appears to have wider support among native groups, some of which are equity partners in proposed multibillion-dollar projects.

Eyford said he did not know if his final report will be made public.

Update March 20: Photo added

Free newsletter

The Canadian Legal Newswire is a FREE weekly newsletter that keeps you up to date on news and analysis about the Canadian legal scene. A separate InHouse Edition is delivered every two weeks, providing targeted news and information of interest to in-house counsel.

Please complete the form below to receive the weekly Canadian Legal Newswire and/or the Canadian Inhouse Legal Newswire.

Recent articles & video

Quebec taking harsh line on cannabis edibles

Will the conversation catalyzed by the Law Society of Ontario mean the end of articling?

Copyright law: set for an overhaul?

Corporate Counsel Survey 2019 closes on Monday, Aug 26

When Legal Aid is a political prop, Access to justice suffers

The subsidiary entity exposure conundrum

Most Read Articles

Canadian Judicial Council seeks leave to SCC in Girouard case

The Ontario government is destroying university legal clinics

Quebec taking harsh line on cannabis edibles

Will the conversation catalyzed by the Law Society of Ontario mean the end of articling?