Skip to content
Michael Spratt

The war on drugs blindly marches on

After 10 years of tough-on-crime ideology, Canada is back with a new and progressive Liberal government. At least this is the narrative.

The most progressive and certainly highest-profile plank of the Liberal’s justice platform was the promise to legalize and regulate marijuana “right away.” In reality, with the promise of legislation not until 2017, “right away” is proving to be a long, long time.

In the meantime, the war on drugs blindly marches on.

Let’s just get this out of the way right now: The war on drugs has been a complete and abject failure. The social and financial cost of drug criminalization outweighs any illusory benefit. Yet on we blindly march.

Over the past 10 years, arrests for possession of marijuana have increased by 28 per cent. In 2014, approximately 50,000 people were arrested for simply possessing marijuana. Ultimately, about 24,500 of those people ended up in court.

Our court dockets are not filled with middle-class white kids caught smoking a joint. These kids are cut slack. Police decline to charge and prosecutors often divert or withdraw these marijuana charges.

There are echoes of racism in Canada’s pot laws. Minorities and aboriginal communities are disproportionately charged, prosecuted, and incarcerated.

In simple terms, the criminalization of marijuana does more harm than good.

Every year, scores of young men and women are killed over relatively small amounts of pot — killed because marijuana is illegal, making it the focus of a vastly profitable and violent black market.

Marijuana criminalization imposes unreasonable penalties on a relatively low-risk vice. In the real world, a drug record means limited employment opportunities, travel difficulties, and many other devastating collateral consequences.

These costs, more often than not, are borne by the most vulnerable members of our communities. Despite the promise of legalization, the status quo continues and the Liberal government — the party of the Charter and sunny ways — is just fine with this.

Liberal MP Bill Blair — the man in charge of the marijuana file — described the rate of marijuana charges as “shocking,” yet, last week, the government opposed an NDP motion calling for its decriminalization while we wait for the slow wheels of legalization to turn.

It is not just the NDP that recognizes the absurd expenditure of resources for policing, prosecuting, and stigmatizing otherwise law-abiding citizens for an activity that will soon be legal. Ontario Court Justice Robert Selkirk, in R. v. Racine, refused to accept a guilty plea for possession of marijuana, saying:

“I recall distinctly the Prime Minister in the House of Commons saying it’s going to be legalized. I’m not going to be the last judge in this country to convict somebody of simple possession of marijuana. . . .You can’t have the Prime Minister announcing it’s going to be legalized and then stand up and prosecute it. It just can’t happen. It’s a ludicrous situation, ludicrous.”

In response to the NDP’s decriminalization motion, the government claimed that there was “no reason to hastily rush into decriminalization.” I suppose this is true if you are a privileged, white kid. But the people who actually get charged with possession of marijuana probably disagree.

Selkirk recognized the reality; there is indeed an urgent need to rush into decriminalization. Young men are in jail because of pot, people lose their jobs because they were caught smoking a joint, and police use marijuana as a pretext to detain and search. In short, it is not marijuana that destroys lives but its criminalization.

It is inconceivable that a government that wraps itself in the language of equality, progressiveness, and the Charter can be so blind to this reality.

The government has justified the legalization of marijuana as a way of keeping it out of the hands of children. This purported purpose is nothing more than convenient political cover. As with alcohol and tobacco, it is regulation following legalization that imposes controls on lawful distribution and consumption.

Regulation keeps kids safe — and let’s not over-emphasize this aspect of the issue — we are talking about pot not loaded firearms. Legalization removes the unfairness, racism, and over-intrusion by state into an activity that is relatively low-risk. This is the real injustice.

But by focusing on the politically palatable sales pitch of “protecting children,” the government has turned a blind eye to the true harms of the continued criminalization of marijuana.

For every day that “right away” is delayed, we pay a significant financial and social price and the war on drugs blindly marches on.

  • The American war on drugs

    Ken Cohen
    At least our foolish "war" is only 10 years old, although the legislation itself dates to the early 20th century.

    In the US, Richard Nixon declared the "war on drugs" around 1970. There is no sign of an end to it in that ailing country where the costs in lives lost and ruined, money and highly visible discrimination are too high to calculate.
  • Drug War is More

    Jack Roe
    The blame is on the legal profession.

    A bright 12th grader who can use the Internet and read old law stuff (pre Norman Conquest, Lord Coke, Blackstone, etc.) can get a sense of where we went off the rails, it was with legal positivism, the idea that natural law is nonsense---that's basically saying it's nonsense that someone should need to be summoned, heard before acted upon judicially.

    Blaming parliament, the liberals, well, they're mostly lawyers. If you want to talk about a group that certainly has the income to use but doesn't get arrested/charged, let's talk about lawyers. Judge Chevalier in Quebec said that most all lawyers, to say nothing of judges, would have records for marijuana if the law were enforced equally.
  • Same as it ever was

    Wayne Phillips
    (1 02 2)

    Actually, given the history of the Liberals in relation to the origins of the criminalization of cannabis in 1923 in CANADA, it is not inconceivable that this government wrap itself in the language of equality, progressiveness, and the Charter at all.

    The medicinal cannabis program MMAR is another example of Liberal expertise that ultimately led to the Conservatives implementation of the MMPR and the system of Licensed Producers. While Liberal affiliates were quick to get on board in various capacities, the Liberal Party has done nothing to fix the gross inadequacies of the program.

SPECIAL REPORTS



Save