Skip to content

Quebec law group calling for quotas on bar admissions

Young Bar of Montreal study shows 18.2% of lawyers called to the bar can’t find permanent jobs
|Written By David Dias

The Young Bar of Montreal is calling for immediate action — including strict quotas on bar admissions — to shore up a rapidly deteriorating job market after releasing a report that underscores dismal employment prospects for law students in the province.

Caroline Larouche says YBM suggests the entire way that law is practised really needs to change.
The YBM’s 56-page report, entitled “Employment and Young Lawyers in Quebec,” is based on a survey of 1,346 lawyers called to the bar within 10 years.

The numbers are shocking. Over the past 10 years, salaries for articling positions in the province have dropped an inflation-adjusted 16 per cent, to $543 per week, while the number of unpaid articling positions has more than doubled.

Even students who manage to find articling positions and receive their call to the bar are reporting difficulty landing a permanent job: 18.2 per cent of respondents said they were unable to find a job in law after receiving their call, compared to 11.2 per cent a decade ago.

Caroline Larouche, YBM’s president, says the association decided to conduct the survey in mid-2014 after their executive committee started hearing worrisome reports about a growing supply/demand problem in the province.

“We were hearing a lot of negative comments about the market, so we weren’t surprised by the [numbers], but we were surprised by how severe the situation is, and how much the situation has deteriorated in the past 10 years.”

At the root of the problem is a simple oversupply of lawyers — 326 per 100,000 residents in the province — although Larouche says that glut is exacerbated by a lack of innovation and failure to meet client needs.

“There have never been so many lawyers in Quebec, but at the same time, there have never been more people representing themselves in court,” she says. “Clients want to be more involved in the decision-making process, and they want to pay less money. So that’s why we suggest that the entire way of practising law should change.”

Lawyer quotas are another, more controversial solution. The report proposes that the École du Barreau, which administers bar exams in the province, enforce stricter quotas aimed at reducing the per-capita lawyer population by 19 per cent, to 275 lawyers per 100,000 residents — a healthier balance that can already be found in Alberta.

In Ontario, meanwhile, a ratio of 339 lawyers per 100,000 residents has already led to an articling crisis that has forced the Law Society of Upper Canada to accept academic substitutes.

“We are not facing the articling crisis in Quebec that we saw in Ontario,” says Larouche. “The problem is not at that level yet, but if we do nothing we will face the same crisis that Ontario and the United States is facing.”

The association’s report also recommends business administration training for law students (many of whom will end up in corporate management roles) and more realistic information about job prospects for students in high school and CEGEP.

As it stands, Larouche says students are getting a false impression of their earning and employment potential: “Emploi Québec still advertises an average salary of $80,000 in the first year of the profession, which is quite different than the reality.”

Perhaps most importantly, the report demands that the various professional bodies — law schools, bar associations, the ministry of justice and the law society — develop strategies to solve the problem together, instead of working separately, or worse, at odds with one another.

“We all have our projects and we tend to forget that communication is the key to success and we need to stop to work individually,” she says. “It’s not a lack of leadership, but it’s a lack of connective work.”

  • Time to scale back...

    James Williams
    There is no reason to think that the Canadian market will not follow the USA, UK, Australia and other countries. Simply put, those markets are bloodbaths for new graduates.

    Best to ramp down the production of lawyers, restrict the number of entrants into law schools, and allow the market to continue its course. All that we are doing is signing up students for an increasingly precarious future.
  • Appalling

    Stephen Scott
    A restaurant-owners association in Quebec once proposed restricting the number of new licenses, claiming harm from recessionary conditions No new restaurants,-- can you believe that?

    Self-serving attempts to restrict freedom of access to all occupations, including businesses and professions, on economic grounds, are not new, but they are obnoxious to a free society and they are contemptible. You would think that these members of the legal profession would understand this. They should realize, too, that legal qualifications can be excellent for work in many kinds of businesses and other organizations.

    For several years I was a member of the Bar committee which ran the Bar school and examinations. I corrected many exams, and lawyers on my panels always rooted for the candidate to get enough marks to pass. No hint ever of anti-competitive reflexes. This obnoxious report can create suspicion that Bar Examinations may be used for more than maintaining standards.
  • Lawyers should control entry into their profession - just like cab drivers!

    Steven Smart
    It's strange how lawyers who make a living protecting the interests of clients are so laden with guilt when they make any move that might be deemed antithetical to "competition" (See above response to the article).

    Doctors, cab drivers and many skilled trades (especially union) strictly control entry into their occupations and businesses and don't seem to run afoul of the competition bureau. However, lawyers and the law school industry seem hell bent on ensuring that working conditions for them are as competitive, crowded and unpleasant as possible (and quake in fear about seeming to look "non competitive".
  • Crazy

    Mike Mike
    This is full-on crazy. I'm not sure where the YBM got the idea that the purpose of the regulator is to "pull up the ladder" and protect existing licensees from new competition.

SPECIAL REPORTS



Save

SUBSCRIBE TO LEGAL FEEDS

BY EMAIL

AWARDS

  • clawbies 2015
    clawbies 2014
  • clawbies 2013
    clawbies 2012
  • clawbies 2011
    clawbies 2010