The Canadian Lawyer Compensation Survey provides unique insight into the ways in which partners, associates and in-house counsel are compensated across the country.
Innovatio Awards celebrate in-house counsel, both individuals and teams, who have found ways to show leadership by becoming more efficient, innovative and creative in meeting the needs of their organizations within the Canadian legal markets
When: September 19, 2017
Where: Arcadian Court, Toronto
Event Detail: 2017 Nominations are now closed
Presented by Lexpert, the prestigious Rising Stars Awards Gala honours winners from across Canada and welcomes law firm and in-house leaders and distinguished guests to celebrate and network with others who are at the top of the legal profession
When: November 16, 2017
Where: Fairmont Royal York Hotel, Toronto
The Canadian Dealmakers honour companies and individuals whose M&A transactions have significantly impacted their industry through innovation and growth; establishment of best practices; enhancement of customer needs and products; and creation of value
When: March 8, 2018
Event Detail: To learn more about the event click here
Presented by Lexpert, these awards recognize individuals and teams from law firms, academia, law societies and corporations that have made a significant contribution to the legal community
When: June 22, 2017
Event Detail: To see this year's winners click here
The Lexpert CCCA Corporate Counsel Directory & Yearbook is a joint endeavour of the Canadian Corporate Counsel Association and Lexpert. It provides the most extensive listing of corporate counsel in Canada.
Find a Corporate Counsel
The A.G. of Ontario at the Legal Innovation Zone (LIZ): there are now many sources developing such "apps" for the intended purpose of making legal services affordable. It cannot be done with apps alone. The industry development process will be as follows.
First, there will be a rationalization process among all the many producers, such that there be a reduction to those apps most popularly used.
Secondly, there will be a consolidation process of mergers, acquisitions, and financial failures for various reasons.
Then thirdly, the dominant market-controlling producers will emerge who will be the biggest and therefore most successful producers. That will threaten LIZ's operations, unless LIZ becomes a thoroughly commercial producer, motivated, financed, staffed, and equipped to compete with those biggest producers. They will have their own experimental-developmental departments and be very well financed.
So, unless LIZ is able to compete at that level, it will have to find something else to do. That's why I recommended that it become a civil service for all of Canada's law societies, with the University of Ottawa providing the French language counterpart. Law society management structure is still that of the 19th century, managed by practising lawyers whose top priority is their own law offices and clients. Therefore Canada's law societies are incompetently managed. Like a government without a civil service, they cannot govern.
That is why the present unaffordable legal services problem makes victims of the majority of Canada's population. The problem has been allowed to develop for several decades with no remedial action being taken. The legal profession has priced itself beyond the majority of Canada's residents. LIZ would have no competitors providing such a civil service function for all of Canada's law societies, and paid for by enabling CanLII to provide at cost a legal opinion service as does LAO LAW at Legal Aid Ontario. Canada's law societies are soon to be under threat of abolition if they cannot demonstrate that they are honestly and effectively trying to solve the problem. Right now, they have nothing of that nature--no program the purpose of which is to solve the problem of unaffordable legal services. The social media, and then the news media, will soon make the problem a major topic of discussion and complaint. Canada's Attorneys General and the law societies are not prepared for that.
2. The Attorney General of Ontario is giving our tax money to the development of "apps" without knowing what impact, if any, they will have on that problem. Apps cannot cure the problem of unaffordable legal services. Making a producer of anything more cost-efficient cannot in itself make its goods or services affordable. That is why all manufacturing uses "support services methods" of production. For example, that is why the "parts industry" exists to help the auto manufacturers make affordable automobiles. If they were made the same way that automobile were first made, 120 years ago, they too would be too expensive for the majority of the population. It wasn't enough to make each auto manufacturer itself more cost-efficient.
Similarly, all medical services are produced by means of support services methods. There are no generalists. And so, no doctor's office provides all treatments and all remedies for all patients the way that a lawyer's office does for all clients. The legal profession has not suffered the pressure that forces innovation in its methods of production as has the medical profession had to endure such pressure.
So, tell the A.G. of Ontario to spend our tax money more responsibly with greater forethought, and tell LIZ to think further into the future as to justifying its existence.