First Decision (2024 ONSC 5037)
- Plaintiff Rana Alsous claimed a beneficial interest in 227 Rymal Road, arguing she funded its purchase.
- The court found Rymal Road was purchased using proceeds from Upper Sherman, a property held in trust for Ibrahim Shaheen (defendants’ father).
- Rana failed to prove she owned Upper Sherman or had an interest in its proceeds.
- The court ruled Rymal Road was held in trust for Ibrahim, not for Rana, and she had no ownership interest.
- Outcome: The claim was dismissed, and the remaining sale proceeds of Rymal Road were directed to Ibrahim’s estate.
Second Decision (2025 ONSC 1052 – Costs)
- Defendants sought $219,589.41 in costs but were awarded $155,000 on a partial indemnity basis.
- The court noted Rana’s lack of credibility but did not find her conduct scandalous or outrageous, rejecting higher cost penalties.
- Rana rejected settlement offers, including $50,000 (July 2023) and $100,000 (family litigation settlement).
- Final Order: Rana must pay $155,000 in costs within 30 days, with a possible $8,500 setoff.
Final Outcome (Both Decisions)
- Rana lost her claim to Rymal Road.
- She must pay $155,000 to the defendants.
- The remaining sale proceeds go to Ibrahim’s estate.
