International News Roundup: Clifford Chance hires US government lawyer as partner...

Expansion for UK legal services firm, and lawyer accuses WeWork of racial and gender discrimination...

International News Roundup: Clifford Chance hires US government lawyer as partner...

Clifford Chance hires US government lawyer as partner
International firm Clifford Chance has hired a lawyer from the US Department of Justice (DOJ) as a partner in its Americas Litigation & Dispute Resolution practice.

Peter J. Mucchetti was with the DOJ for 19 years, initially as a trial attorney, and most recently led its 25-lawyer healthcare and consumer products team.

"His depth of knowledge on the US regulatory landscape derives from more than two decades of antitrust litigation, investigations and merger clearance experience," said David DiBari, head of the Americas Litigation & Dispute Resolution practice.

Last year the firm hired General Electric competition lawyer Sharis Pozen to co-lead its global antitrust practice.

Fast-growing UK legal services firm expands north and south
UK publicly-listed legal services firm Knights Group Holdings has announced two acquisitions as it expands its power base.

The firm has added law firms in both the southeast and north of the country following recent acquisitions in the central region. These acquisitions fit with the firm’s stated strategy to be the UK’s  leading legal and professional services business outside London.

Since listing on the stock market in 2018, the firm has seen its share value grow 254%.

Lawyer accuses WeWork of racial and gender discrimination
by Sol Dolor
A lawyer has sued WeWork for racial and gender discrimination, accusing the company of unfairly favouring others after it reneged on the pay and title it offered while recruiting her.

Ayesha Whyte, who is an African American woman, said that WeWork promised her in 2018 a salary of US$195,000 and the tile of “director of employee relations” at the start-up’s Manhattan headquarters, according to the New York Daily News.

After Whyte left her lucrative job at The Walt Disney Company and moved her family, WeWork did not give her the title, cut the promised pay by 20%, and told her she would need to move to Washington, DC, the lawyer alleges.

What’s more, the suite said that WeWork then hired a non-African American man and gave that employee more than twice the pay for the role she was promised.

WeWork is represented by Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, Corporate Counsel reported. The company’s lawyers have moved to transfer the case, filed Friday at the state court of New York, to the US District Court for the Southern District of New York.

The lawyers said that the state court does not have jurisdiction over the case, since Whyte is not a New York resident, and because the damages sought exceeded US$75,000.

The suit said that Whyte was included in a workforce reduction plan, but nobody else in the employee relations department was also fired. It also alleged that WeWork tried to pressure Whyte to agree to confidential arbitration, saying repeatedly that the company would seek attorney’s fees and costs against her if she proceeded with the case in a public court.

The lawsuit also said that what happened to Whyte is not an isolated event.

“At multiple levels throughout the organization, WeWork keeps people of colour out of leadership positions and under-compensated,” the suit said.

It also said that the company had repeatedly hired less experienced Caucasians for positions in its human resources department, all while it had employees of colour who were qualified for those roles.

A WeWork spokesperson told several news organisations that the company prioritises equal employment opportunity, including hiring, promotion, and compensation. The company believes Whyte’s claims are “wholly without merit,” the spokesperson said.

Recent articles & video

Sarah Teich: Top 25 Most Influential Lawyer shares her fight for human rights

Alberta Court of King's Bench orders sale of estate lands, ending 30-year dispute among heirs

BC Supreme Court dismisses attempt to overturn spousal support agreement as abuse of process

Ontario Court of Appeal rejects extension to appeal medical malpractice case due to lack of merit

BC Supreme Court approves deductions for future benefits in PI case despite payment uncertainties

Arbitration Act bars appeal of court-appointed arbitrator: Ontario Court of Appeal

Most Read Articles

Federal Court rejects Canada Recovery Benefit claim due to insufficient evidence and missed hearing

BC Supreme Court rejects employer's attempt to move employment dispute to arbitration

Federal Court overrules denial of taxpayer relief due to procedural fairness breach

BC Supreme Court dismisses claim to waive solicitor-client privilege in family law dispute