System too lenient on cops using excessive force: Ruby

Prominent civil rights lawyer Clayton Ruby says police have too much leeway to use excessive force because there is no will to punish officers who cross the line.

Those with the power to punish police who use excessive force give cops far too much leeway, says Clayton Ruby.Canada’s Criminal Code allows anyone authorized by law, if acting “on reasonable grounds” to use “as much force as is necessary” in enforcing the law. While that wording is intentionally to general to cover different situations, Ruby says that vagueness, coupled with a lack of strong oversight, emboldens some police to act as aggressively as they choose.

“The terms are extremely general so they tend to bear whatever meaning the individual police officer wants to assign to it,” he says. “And in Canada, as in the U.S., judges and juries and police chiefs refuse to use these phrases to put a limit on police activity. They don’t charge the police and they acquit them when they are charged. It’s a sham.”

Ruby mentions U.S. police in reference to the last week’s grand jury decision to not lay charges against a white police officer after a fatal confrontation with an unarmed black man. New York city police officer Daniel Pantaleo faced indictment over the death of Eric Garner, who died after Pantaleo applied what some are calling an illegal chokehold manoeuvre.

Pantaleo’s lawyer says the alleged chokehold was an authorized takedown manoeuvre taught by the NYPD.

Prosecutor Daniel Donovan didn’t provide any details about how the jury reached its decision, but the incident still provokes questions over what constitutes reasonable force.

Canada has seen its own troubling cases of use of police force in recent years.

Last year, Toronto police fatally shot 18-year-old Sammy Yatim on a streetcar in, shooting him nine times — six after he hit the ground — then Tasered him.

And in 2007, the death of Polish immigrant Robert Dziekanski made international headlines when he died after five Taser shots from police at the Vancouver International Airport. The officers claimed they felt threatened when Dziekanski picked up a stapler.

Toronto lawyer Peter Rosenthal agrees that police get “too much leeway” to act aggressively and abandon genuine attempts at non-violent de-escalation.

Rosenthal represented the family of Michael Eligon, a 29-year-old mentally ill man shot dead by Toronto police in 2012 as he approached an officer while wielding scissors in both hands. He says police training promotes a “backward way of thinking” when it comes to dealing with potentially aggressive suspects.

He says despite many inquests and recommendations for police to try more verbal de-escalation of crises, they resort to force as the default option.

“[Police] exaggerate the danger and they don’t recognize that the best way of dealing with the danger is would be talking to the person,” he insists. “In many of these confrontations, there’s time for the officer to try talking to the person. It must be tried in my view unless there’s immediate danger.”

He agrees that stricter enforcement is needed.

“Prosecutions have been few and far between but even fewer than there should have been, in my view,” he says.

Last week, a Toronto police officer got a $50 fine and six months probation for assaulting a man sitting handcuffed in his cruiser. A judge agreed the officer went beyond reasonable force in that situation, but Ruby says the punishment is emblematic of a system that won’t restrain officers who cross the line.

“The judge refused to impose any real penalty and encouragement to [use excessive force] and worry about the law later,” Ruby says. “Courts are afraid to seriously punish police. They know they are going to be dealt with extremely leniently and they won’t suffer any consequences for it.”

Free newsletter

The Canadian Legal Newswire is a FREE weekly newsletter that keeps you up to date on news and analysis about the Canadian legal scene. A separate InHouse Edition is delivered every two weeks, providing targeted news and information of interest to in-house counsel.

Please complete the form below to receive the weekly Canadian Legal Newswire and/or the Canadian Inhouse Legal Newswire.

Recent articles & video

Law careers may start on Instagram…

Top Intellectual Property and Labour and Employment Boutiques survey closes on Friday

Differentiating common law from marriage in family law

Insights on Quebec’s plan to restrict the sale of cannabis edibles

Make legal aid an election issue

Move slow and fix things

Most Read Articles

True North and Rebel News seek judicial review on press accreditation denial for debates

EY Law overtakes PwC in global alternative legal services rankings

Convicted person has right to lesser of two punishments existing at time of commission or sentencing

How much does the GC at News Corp earn?