This week at the SCC

This week, the Supreme Court of Canada will hear three appeals, including a jurisdictional appeal in the Cassels Brock auto dealership case and a sexual assault case that pits individual Charter rights against the public interest.

supreme court of canadaDec. 1 – Alberta – Saeed v. R.

Charter of Rights: Upon arrest for sexual assault, the appellant was compelled by police to provide a swab from his penis. The swab contained DNA of the victim in the incident, leading to a conviction on sexual assault and sexual interference. Alberta’s appeal court, citing precedents, upheld the conviction despite acknowledging a breach of the appellant’s Charter rights. The SCC will review whether the appeal court mischaracterized the magnitude of the Charter breach. A publication ban is in place.

Read the Alberta appeal court decision

Related news stories:
SCC zeroes in on penile swabs, Law Times

Alberta genital swab case heads to Supreme Court of Canada, CBC

Dec. 2 – British Columbia – K.R.J. v. R.

Charter of Rights: The appellant pleaded guilty to charges relating to incest and child pornography committed before 2012. In August 2012, s. 161 of the Criminal Code was amended to include community supervision provisions for such offenders upon release. The appeal court ruled that these amendments apply retroactively. The SCC will review whether additional community supervision measures amount to additional punishment. A publication ban and a sealing order is in place.

Read the British Columbia Court of Appeal decision
http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/jdb-txt/CA/14/03/2014BCCA0382.htm

Dec. 3 – Ontario – Lapointe Rosenstein Marchand Melançon v. Cassels Brock & Blackwell

Choice of forum: Auto dealerships across Quebec launched a class action against Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP claiming the firm, which had represented the Canadian Automobile Dealers’ Association, had been negligent in legal advice relating to the closure of numerous dealerships by General Motors. The law firm countered that it only had the mandate to represent the association, and thus added 150 lawyers and law firms across Canada as third-party defendants. The applicants are law firms and lawyers in Quebec seeking an order that Ontario’s courts do not have jurisdiction to hear the proceeding.

Read the Ontario Court of Appeal decision

Related news stories:
Cassels Brock hit with $45 million in damages in GM dealers class action, Canadian Lawyer

Free newsletter

The Canadian Legal Newswire is a FREE weekly newsletter that keeps you up to date on news and analysis about the Canadian legal scene. A separate InHouse Edition is delivered every two weeks, providing targeted news and information of interest to in-house counsel.

Please complete the form below to receive the weekly Canadian Legal Newswire and/or the Canadian Inhouse Legal Newswire.

Recent articles & video

Daphne Dumont to receive CBA’s Cecilia I. Johnstone award

Quebec taking harsh line on cannabis edibles

Will the conversation catalyzed by the Law Society of Ontario mean the end of articling?

Copyright law: set for an overhaul?

Corporate Counsel Survey 2019 closes on Monday, Aug 26

When Legal Aid is a political prop, Access to justice suffers

Most Read Articles

Canadian Judicial Council seeks leave to SCC in Girouard case

The Ontario government is destroying university legal clinics

Quebec taking harsh line on cannabis edibles

Will the conversation catalyzed by the Law Society of Ontario mean the end of articling?