Assured division must pay $35m for discrimination conspiracy

Disabled worker accused firm of misrepresenting his work restrictions to employer

Assured division must pay $35m for discrimination conspiracy

Insurance broker AP Keenan must pay a disabled worker $34.5m, a jury trial has ruled.

AP Keenan, which became part of Assured Partners in 2017, was a co-defendant in the Santa Cruz Superior Court jury trial.

The plaintiff claimed to have been wrongfully terminated from his job with Santa Cruz City Schools, of which the workers’ compensation insurance administrator was named as a co-defendant.

The former school employee alleged that AP Keenan had repeatedly misrepresented his work restrictions to the school district.

Further, he alleged that the agent had altered certain medical reports before supplying them to the district.

On May 23, the jury found that AP Keenan had conspired with the district to flout California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA).

They also found that AP Keenan had aided, abetted, incited, coerced or compelled the district to violate FEHA rules, and/or had attempted to do so.

A sum of $6.9m was initially awarded in compensatory damages.

A punitive damages trial phase followed, because the jury found AP Keenan had acted with “malice, oppression, or fraud”.

The jury went on to award a punitive damages verdict of $27.6m, bringing the total damages against AP Keenan to $34.5m.

Insurance Business has approached Assured Partners for comment.

Recent articles & video

AI funding announcement good news for tech sector, but also means legislation coming: BLG lawyer

Manitoba Court of Kings's Bench underscores lawyers' responsibilities to clients in estate planning

2024 budget contains a few surprises, says Davies tax partner Christopher Anderson

Canadian Human Rights Commission releases 2023 Annual Report highlighting challenges and progress

Shannon Mason named as newest judge of Nova Scotia Supreme Court Family Division

Alberta welcomes seven new judges: Friesen, Hawkes, McGuire, Brookes, Parker, Ho, and Jugnauth

Most Read Articles

BC Supreme Court upholds mother’s will against son's claims for greater inheritance

BC Supreme Court clarifies when spousal and child support obligations should end

Federal Court approves $817 million settlement for disabled Canadian veterans

2024 Canadian Law Awards Excellence Awardees revealed