White & Case expands IP practice and global tech industry group

Jordan Coyle joins as a partner in Washington, DC

White & Case expands IP practice and global tech industry group

White & Case LLP is expanding its intellectual property practice and global technology industry group with the addition of Jordan Coyle as a partner in Washington, DC.

Coyle specializes in Section 337 investigations before the US International Trade Commission, representing technology companies in disputes involving intellectual property right claims, including allegations of patent and trademark infringement.

"Section 337 investigations pose an enormous risk to companies," said Yar Chaikovsky, head of White & Case's intellectual property practice. "As technology companies and investors prioritize securing supply chains, the fast-paced nature of these investigations means their popularity will only accelerate.”

Coyle's addition continues the expansion of White & Case's IP practice, following the recent addition of Chaikovsky, as well as partners Phil Ou, Bruce Yen and David Okano, who all joined the firm's Silicon Valley office earlier this year.

"White & Case is known for advising on high-profile, complex matters across the technology industry, and successfully navigating ITC litigation remains a priority for many of our clients," said Nicole Erb, White & Case's Americas regional section head of trade, IP and white collar. "Adding a talented ITC litigator like Jordan further strengthens our position as a leading choice for market participants across the full spectrum of IP matters in the technology sector.”

 

Recent articles & video

SCC confirms manslaughter convictions in case about proper jury instructions on causation

Law firm associate attrition continues to decline, NALP Foundation study shows

How systemizing law firm work allocation enhances diversity efforts and overcomes affinity bias

Dentons advises Saturn on $600 million acquisition of Saskatchewan oil assets

Ontario Court of Appeal upholds anesthesiologist’s liability in severe birth complications case

BC Supreme Court assigns liability in rear-end vehicle collision at Surrey intersection

Most Read Articles

BC Supreme Court rules for equal asset division in Port Alberni property dispute

BC Supreme Court rules vehicle owner and driver liable for 2011 Chilliwack collision

BC Supreme Court upholds solicitor-client privilege in medical negligence case

Ontario Court of Appeal upholds anesthesiologist’s liability in severe birth complications case