Goodale owes hero, not public-safety threat, an apology

Through his bureaucrats, and by signing the decision directly, Ralph tried to do Than Soe harm for an act of profound heroism 29 years ago.

Ron Poulton

The Respondent in Soe v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) is officially noted as the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness, Ralph Goodale. Since his actions in relation to Than Soe were so highly criticized by the Federal Court, I think it best that he take public, and personal, responsibility for what he and his Delegate tried to do. Through his bureaucrats, and by signing the decision directly, Ralph tried to do Than Soe harm for an act of profound heroism 29 years ago. Although this act did start with the commission of a crime, his purpose was to warn the world of a sinister purpose afoot in Asia. Only now, some 29 years later, do we understand how right Than Soe was. Ralph Goodale still doesn’t get it.

Some 29 years ago, Than Soe boarded a Burmese airplane with laundry boxes and fake bombs and told the pilot to re-direct the plane to Thailand. His purpose was not financial gain nor notoriety. His purpose was to draw attention to heinous crimes being perpetuated in his beloved Burma by a monstrous regime run by military generals and their military whims. Peaceful demonstrators were being gunned down in the streets of then Rangoon, Burma, on a daily basis, and democracy was in peril. And yet, the world outside remained silent and disinterested.

With the death tolls mounting, and the international community mute to the horrors, Than Soe, at the age of 19, summoned the courage to board a plane filled with Burmese soldiers. He boarded the plane, pretended he had a weapon, and told the pilot he meant no harm but that he had to redirect the plane; the killing had to stop and he could think of no other way to stop it. He said he was sorry and that no one would be harmed.

And no one was harmed. Than Soe wanted to warn the world of an army; an army that had no moral bounds; that would kill its own citizens; and that was to be feared. But still, the world did not listen and 29 years later, that army turned its malevolent eye to the destruction of the Rohingya people. Now the world takes notice. Genocide is a bit harder to ignore.

But still Canada sought to punish Than Soe, first, by forcing him back to Burma (now Myanmar) and into the clutches of that army. Without the intervention of a Federal Court judge, Ralph Goodale, Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness, would have been successful in doing just that. Despite this intervention, Than Soe was left in perpetual limbo as his plea for Minister’s exemption and s. 34(2) relief was refused – again and again. In the Federal Court’s latest rebuke of Minister Goodale, Justice Russell overturned the decision refusing Than Soe’s exemption plea noting that the conclusion that Than Soe was a risk to national security and public safety today in Canada because of what he did some 29 years before lacked “justification, transparency and intelligibility” and was unreasonable. 

What Than Soe did some 29 years ago was attempt to warn the world that a new monster lurked in the shadows of his beloved but darkening country. He used the only way he could think of given the circumstances he found himself in. The world failed to heed his warning then, but appears to understand it now. As the UN Secretary General recently stated: the Mynamar government was to be held accountable for "one of the world's worst humanitarian and human rights crises." Than Soe predicted this, 29 years ago. His punishment now of uncertainty and fear of refoulment, does not fit his “crime.”


Free newsletter

The Canadian Legal Newswire is a FREE newsletter that keeps you up to date on news and analysis about the Canadian legal scene. A separate InHouse Edition is delivered on a regular basis, providing targeted news and information of interest to in-house counsel.

Please enter your email address below to subscribe.

Recent articles & video

Excessive speeding, even momentarily, can be departure from reasonable standard of care: SCC

How does the COVID-19 criminal trials shutdown affect Charter rights of those awaiting trial?

COVID-19 layoffs, government benefits pose novel questions for employment lawyers

Legal Report: litigation ‘Green Rush’

B.C.’s Civil Resolution Tribunal keeps ‘doors open’ during pandemic

COVID-19 and the courts: March 27 update

Most Read Articles

COVID-19 and Ontario’s courts

COVID-19: law firms going remote, some restricting access to offices

How COVID-19 is forcing Canadian law schools to transition to online learning

‘No one knows what tomorrow will bring:’ Urgent matters for kids, families persist as pandemic rages