4.4-billion-dollar case continues with Bennett Jones, Adair Goldblatt Bieber, Osler

Adair Goldblatt Bieber appears five times in Commercial List litigation roundup

4.4-billion-dollar case continues with Bennett Jones, Adair Goldblatt Bieber, Osler

Among the notable corporate commercial cases before the Toronto court this week, Sakab Saudi Holding Company et al v. Saad Khalid S Al Jabri et al, continues with a concerned amount of $4,445,000,000. Plaintiff Sakab Saudi Holding Company and several others are represented by Amanda McLachlan of Bennett Jones. Defendant Al Jabri is represented by John Adair of Adair Goldblatt Bieber and defendant Gryphon Secure Inc. and several others are represented by Lauren Tomasich of Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt.

Adair Goldblatt Bieber in five cases this week

John Adair, founding partner, represented respondent S. Wookey and several others in Wookey et al v. Wookey et al, defendant K. Al Jabri in Sakab Saudi Holding Company et al v. Saad Khalid S Al Jabri et al, and applicant O. Wookey and two others in Wookey, in her capacities as special trustees of the Estate of Ian Richard Wookey et al v. Wookey et al. Adair’s extensive experience includes litigating matters in the areas of commercial litigation, partnership disputes, professional negligence, administrative disputes, and estate litigation.

Simon Bieber, founding partner, represented plaintiff GTA Mixed-Use Developments L.P. and several others in Tridelta Investment Counsel Inc. et al v. GTA Mixed-Use Developments GP Inc. et al. Bieber’s practice focuses on commercial/corporate litigation, class actions, directors’ and officers’ liability, securities litigation, and professional negligence.

Jordan Goldblatt, managing partner, represented plaintiff C. Marsh and one other in Marsh et al v. Electronica AI Inc. et al. Goldblatt’s focus lies in general commercial, insolvency, product liability, professional responsibility, administrative and public law litigation.

Borden Ladner Gervais appeared in court thrice

Aaron Blumenfeld, partner, represented I. Wookey, Jr. in Wookey, in her capacities as special trustees of the Estate of Ian Richard Wookey et al v. Wookey et al and Wookey et al v. Wookey et al. Blumenfeld has a broad litigation practice, representing clients in disputes concerning fraud, intellectual property, estates, insolvencies, securities and other commercial matters.

Roger Jaipargas, partner, represented applicants Armstrong Flooring, Inc. and three others in Armstrong Flooring, Inc. et al. Jaipargas’ practice focuses on commercial insolvency and restructuring.

Flett Beccario partner represented two plaintiffs

Ross Macfarlane, partner, represented plaintiff Meridian Credit Union Limited in Meridian Credit Union Limited v. Vandermeer Greenhouses LTD. and plaintiff Royal Bank Of Canada in Royal Bank Of Canada v. Ebadi. Macfarlane is a commercial litigator, with an emphasis on debtor/creditor, bankruptcy and insolvency, and commercial disputes.

Garfinkle Biderman LLP Barristers & Solicitors partners represented company in two commercial litigation actions

Wendy Hope Greenspoon-Soer, partner, represented respondent First Spice Mixing Co. (Canada) Ltd. in Wookey, in her capacities as special trustees of the Estate of Ian Richard Wookey et al v. Wookey et al. Greenspoon-Soer specializes in all areas of insolvency and commercial litigation with a strong focus on property-related litigation.

Ronald Birken, partner, represented First Spice Mixing Co. (Canada) Ltd. in Wookey et al v. Wookey et al. Birken practices exclusively in the area of commercial litigation, specializing in real estate, default enforcement, receivership, and bankruptcy.

Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt appeared in two cases

Christopher Naudie, partner, represented plaintiff Tridelta Investment Counsel Inc. in Tridelta Investment Counsel Inc. et al v. GTA Mixed-Use Developments GP Inc. et al. Naudie practises corporate and commercial litigation, with a strong focus on corporate litigation, class action defence and cross-border litigation.

Lauren Tomasich, partner, represented respondents Gryphon Secure Inc. and several others in Sakab Saudi Holding Company et al v. Saad Khalid S Al Jabri et al. Tomasich’s practice focuses on commercial arbitration, corporate and securities litigation, and white-collar defence and enforcement proceedings.

Recent articles & video

Exclusion of casino managers from Quebec’s labour regime constitutional: SCC

Yukon Supreme Court orders release of student contact information in class action lawsuit

Ontario Superior Court rejects worker's psychological impairment claim from a workplace injury

BC Supreme Court clarifies when spousal and child support obligations should end

Federal Court of Appeal rejects employee's complaint of union's failure to fairly represent him

Alberta Court of King's Bench rejects Calderbank offer in medical negligence case

Most Read Articles

BC Supreme Court upholds mother’s will against son's claims for greater inheritance

BC Supreme Court clarifies when spousal and child support obligations should end

2024 Canadian Law Awards Excellence Awardees revealed

Jennifer King at Gowling WLG on ESG and being recognized as a Top 25 Most Influential Lawyer