Federal Court overturns decision to expunge trademark registration due to new evidence of use

The new submissions were significant enough to potentially influence the original decision: court

Federal Court overturns decision to expunge trademark registration due to new evidence of use

The Federal Court has overturned the Registrar of Trademarks' decision to expunge a trademark registration after the applicant presented new evidence of use.

In IBS Inc. v. Mint Green Group Inc., 2024 FC 606, Isaac Bennet Sales Agencies Inc. had appealed the Registrar's decision to expunge its trademark registration for the mark "MINT" due to an alleged failure to file evidence of use during the relevant period from November 9, 2019, to November 9, 2022. The registrar's action came after a notice was issued at the respondent's request, Mint Green Group Inc.

The appeal brought forward by Isaac Bennet was supported by an affidavit from Paul Brener, CFO of Isaac Bennet. Brener's affidavit detailed the use of the mark in association with the sale of clothing and accessories through Canadian retail stores operated by Fairweather. Brener's affidavit provided substantial evidence of the mark's use on products like toques, boots, slippers, and belts sold to consumers within the specified timeframe.

The Federal Court's analysis hinged on the appropriateness of the standard of review and the materiality of the new evidence presented during the appeal. Upon examining the evidence, the court determined that the new submissions were significant enough to potentially influence the registrar's original decision, leading to a review of the case on a correctness standard.

The court was persuaded that the sales and display of the mark on specific items during the relevant period were sufficient to meet the threshold for maintaining the trademark registration. The court stressed the importance of evidentiary detail in trademark disputes, particularly in proving the use of a mark in association with registered goods.

Despite Isaac Bennet's success in the appeal, the court awarded costs against them. This decision was influenced by the precedent that the appeal could have been avoided if the applicant had initially responded adequately to the registrar's notice.

Recent articles & video

Legal industry managers expect pay for lawyers, other industry professionals to rise: report

Poonam Puri on the role of in-house counsel in navigating ESG

Privacy Commissioner’s Annual Reports on Access to Information and Privacy Act tabled in parliament

Ontario Superior Court refuses to remove estate trustees despite breach of fiduciary duties

Alberta Court of King’s Bench dismisses habeas corpus application in child custody dispute

Ontario court orders return of deposit after buyer fails to complete property deal due to bankruptcy

Most Read Articles

Alberta Court of King's Bench orders sale of estate lands, ending 30-year dispute among heirs

Airlines must reimburse passengers according to federal regulations, SCC rules

BC lawyer admits to sexual misconduct, resigns from practice two weeks after announcing retirement

Kinew's convenient amnesia: defence lawyers are crucial, even for him