B.C. urged to stop amendments to freedom of information and privacy legislation

Lawyers' Rights Watch Canada, West Coast LEAF and other groups support call to action

B.C. urged to stop amendments to freedom of information and privacy legislation

A coalition of civil society organizations is urging B.C. to withdraw Bill 22’s amendments to the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act and allow the all-party special committee to complete its work, including an open consultation process.

The BC Freedom of Information and Privacy Association’s president, Mike Larsen, and executive director, Jason Woywada, signed the joint letter dated Oct. 26 and addressed it to John Horgan, B.C.’s premier, and Lisa Beare, B.C.’s citizens’ services minister.

“You have made prior commitments regarding the value you place on transparency and about the need to improve government accountability, but this legislation would make it harder for everyone — concerned citizens, experienced researchers, and you — to get facts rather than spin,” the letter said.

The letter called upon the B.C. government to recognize the all-party special committee’s role, commit to introducing comprehensive amendments to the legislation that reflect past and current special committees’ recommendations and show this commitment by taking steps to improve the transparency of public bodies.

According to the letter, the bill, if passed, will represent a backward step for openness and accountability and a missed opportunity for British Columbians to have better privacy and information rights.

The bill will also undermine access to information and transparency among public bodies regarding vital matters of public interest, will short-circuit the efforts of the special legislative committee that reviews the legislation and will prevent meaningful public consultation, said the letter.

The letter recognized that B.C.’s government could quickly pass this bill, potentially introducing substantive changes to the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act in more than a decade.

“If that happens, it will impact the citizens of British Columbia now, haunt us into the future, and set a dangerous precedent across Canada,” said the letter.

The coalition is led by the BC Freedom of Information and Privacy Association and supported by organizations such as the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association, the B.C. office of the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, the Canadian Institute for Information and Privacy Studies, the Centre for Law and Democracy, the Centre for Access to Information and Justice, Democracy Watch, Lawyers’ Rights Watch Canada, the Privacy and Access Council of Canada, the Public Interest Advocacy Centre, the Union of British Columbia Indian Chiefs, West Coast Legal Education and Action Fund, as well as certain interested individuals.

Recent articles & video

Heenan Blaikie’s collapse changed Canada’s legal community, says chronicler of firm’s history

Voting is now open for Top Ontario Regional Law Firms

Ontario Superior Court upholds arbitrator's ruling overturning union rep's suspension for misconduct

Alberta court allows legal costs in family dispute to survive bankruptcy without preferred status

Ontario Superior Court orders man to vacate family property amid will dispute

PEI Supreme Court upholds misconduct ruling against nurse for aggressive behaviour at care facility

Most Read Articles

Ontario Superior Court voids financial transfers for failing to rebut presumption of resulting trust

Ontario Superior Court orders man to vacate family property amid will dispute

SCC takes flexible approach to corporate attribution doctrine in bankruptcy and insolvency cases

Canadian Judicial Council expands social media guidelines for federal judges