Alberta Court of Appeal orders appellant to pay costs of $50,000 in will dispute

Woman challenges father's will based on undue influence and lack of testamentary capacity

Alberta Court of Appeal orders appellant to pay costs of $50,000 in will dispute

Following an unsuccessful appeal in a will dispute, the Court of Appeal of Alberta has ordered the appellant to pay $50,000 in costs to her brother and her niece, who was the personal representative of the subject estate.

In Gordon Estate (Re), 2024 ABCA 286, the testator died in 2019. His daughter, who was the appellant in this case, challenged the validity of the January 2019 will that excluded her as a beneficiary. She claimed that her niece unduly influenced the testator, who allegedly lacked testamentary capacity.

In response, her brother applied to summarily dismiss her challenge against the will. The Alberta Court of King's Bench granted his application and found her claims meritless. This prompted her to appeal.

Last May, the Alberta Court of Appeal dismissed her appeal. The appeal court found no evidence that the niece exercised undue influence over the testator, who had testamentary capacity when he signed the will.

The brother and the niece sought enhanced costs, specifically solicitor-and-own-client costs, totalling $46,551.87 and $34,798, respectively. They argued that the appellant made meritless claims, engaged in litigation misconduct, and rejected reasonable settlement offers.

Costs of $50,000 awarded

The Alberta Court of Appeal accepted that the appellant’s concerns about her father’s will were genuine. However, the appeal court ultimately deemed these concerns mistaken.

The appeal court found no evidence of undue influence in the drafting and execution of the will. While the testator’s mental state might have fluctuated in his final days, the evidence sufficiently established his capacity to make the will at the time of signing, the appeal court decided.

The appeal court ordered the appellant to pay $50,000 in total costs to her brother and her niece, with an initial payment of $12,000 plus interest to be obtained from the security that she posted for the appeal.

The appeal court calculated that the two respondents would have been entitled to double costs of $32,602.50 each under column 4 of schedule C of the Alberta Rules of Court, Alta Reg 124/2010. However, the appeal court reduced the amounts to $25,000 each, given the overlap in their arguments.

The appeal court noted that the respondents made reasonable settlement offers by telling the appellant that they would pay her solicitor-client costs if she discontinued the action. The appeal court said that her failure to accept these offers contributed to its decision to award these costs against her.

The appeal court rejected the appellant’s request for the estate to pay her costs. While the appellant’s concerns about the will were understandable, the circumstances of this case did not rise to the level of reprehensible, scandalous, or outrageous conduct required to justify solicitor-client costs, the appeal court explained.

Recent articles & video

Airlines must reimburse passengers according to federal regulations, SCC rules

David Sowemimo: Top 25 influential lawyer advocating for justice

Law Society of British Columbia publishes 2023 annual report

Privacy Commissioner calls for interoperable privacy laws at Alberta committee review

BC Supreme Court declares injuries sustained in two separate car accidents indivisible

Canada endorses global effort for age-assurance standards to protect children's privacy

Most Read Articles

BC Supreme Court rejects employer's attempt to move employment dispute to arbitration

BC Supreme Court dismisses claim to waive solicitor-client privilege in family law dispute

Alberta Court of King's Bench orders sale of estate lands, ending 30-year dispute among heirs

BC privacy commissioner to decide whether to tell Airbnb hosts about requests for their data