BC Supreme Court grants testator's estranged daughter an equal share of the estate

The court considered a testator's moral obligations toward independent grown children

BC Supreme Court grants testator's estranged daughter an equal share of the estate

The Supreme Court of British Columbia ruled that a will should be varied to grant the testator’s estranged daughter an equal share of the estate because the original provisions failed to meet the testator's moral obligation to provide for her.

This case, brought under section 60 of the Wills, Estates and Succession Act (WESA), focused on whether the will adequately provided for Celina Kan despite her distant relationship with her father, Tat Kuan. The will left specific bequests to Celina, but the remaining estate—valued at $730,000 at the time of trial—was divided equally between Tat Kuan’s two other daughters, Ina and Sophia. Celina contested the will, seeking a variation to divide the estate equally among all three daughters.

Celina’s claim was rooted in her upbringing. At the age of four, she was sent to live with her father’s sister in Hong Kong, severing her direct relationship with her biological father. While she maintained some contact with him over the years, their relationship was largely distant. Celina’s childhood differed significantly from her sisters, as she was raised in more privileged financial circumstances. However, she testified to experiencing emotional trauma due to being separated from her immediate family.

Throughout the trial, the court considered a testator's moral obligations toward independent adult children, particularly in cases of estrangement. The court, referencing principles established in case law, emphasized that a testator’s autonomy in will-making must be balanced with the moral duty to provide adequate, just, and equitable provision for children.

Although Ina and Sophia argued that their close relationships with Tat Kuan justified their larger shares of the estate, the court found that Celina’s estrangement, caused by her father's decision to relinquish his parental role early in her life, did not negate his moral duty to her. The court concluded that the will's provisions were inadequate and varied to provide Celina with one-third of the estate, equal to her sisters' shares.

Recent articles & video

Airlines must reimburse passengers according to federal regulations, SCC rules

David Sowemimo: Top 25 influential lawyer advocating for justice

Law Society of British Columbia publishes 2023 annual report

Privacy Commissioner calls for interoperable privacy laws at Alberta committee review

BC Supreme Court declares injuries sustained in two separate car accidents indivisible

Canada endorses global effort for age-assurance standards to protect children's privacy

Most Read Articles

BC Supreme Court rejects employer's attempt to move employment dispute to arbitration

BC Supreme Court dismisses claim to waive solicitor-client privilege in family law dispute

Alberta Court of King's Bench orders sale of estate lands, ending 30-year dispute among heirs

BC privacy commissioner to decide whether to tell Airbnb hosts about requests for their data