Alberta Court of Appeal confirms striking out of family law arbitration appeal
The Alberta Court of Appeal has ruled that a judge exercised his discretion judicially when striking out a family law arbitration appeal after the appellant failed to file her appeal materials by the peremptory deadline due to a procedural irregularity.
The case was Patel v Parikh, 2026 ABCA 299. During arbitration, the parties sought to resolve spousal support, retroactive child support, family property division, and other issues.
On Sept. 18, 2023, before the Alberta Court of King’s Bench, the appellant filed an originating application/notice of appeal against the arbitration award under the province’s Arbitration Act, 2000.
The arbitration appeal was scheduled for a two-day hearing, with the appellant’s deadline to file appeal materials set for mid-October 2025.
Several days before that filing deadline, the appellant applied for an extension of time before the Court of King’s Bench. The respondent opposed the application based on allegedly prejudicial delays in the past.
Alberta Court of King’s Bench order on Oct. 9, 2025
On Oct. 9, 2025, a chambers judge of the Court of King’s Bench extended the time for the appellant to file her appeal materials to the peremptory deadline of Oct. 17, 2025, and precluded her from filing additional extension applications without the court’s leave.
The chambers judge stated that the court would strike the arbitration appeal if the appellant failed to file and serve her appeal materials by the close of business on Oct. 17, 2025.
Striking of family law arbitration appeal
On Oct. 17, 2025, the appellant’s counsel tried to e-file the appeal materials between 4:00 and 4:30 p.m., while the respondent received an unfiled copy of the materials that afternoon. However, because of a procedural irregularity, the materials were not filed on Oct. 17, 2025.
With leave, the respondent applied for a confirmation that the arbitration appeal was automatically struck by operation of the Oct. 9, 2025, order.
On Oct. 23, 2025, the chambers judge of the Court of King’s Bench struck the appellant’s appeal.
Alberta Court of Appeal dismisses appeal
Before the Alberta Court of Appeal, the appellant challenged the chambers judge’s order striking her arbitration appeal.
The appeal court dismissed the present appeal. The appeal court ordered the parties, who both represented themselves, to bear their own appeal costs.
Appeal court sees no reviewable error
The Alberta Court of Appeal held that the chambers judge had the discretion to strike the arbitration appeal in the circumstances. The appeal court determined that the chambers judge:
- found the Oct. 9, 2025, order unmistakably clear
- did not treat non-compliance with that order as determinative
- considered the surrounding circumstances, including the information the appellant and her counsel provided
- made no palpable and overriding factual error regarding past deadlines, extensions, or delays, based on the record
Acknowledging that the arbitration appeal had been outstanding for more than two years by October 2025, the appeal court pointed out that the appellant:
- confirmed that there would be no more extension requests
- understood that Oct. 17, 2025, was the final filing date
- was asking the appeal court to reweigh the relevant factors and to exercise its discretion in a different manner than the chambers judge did, which was not the appeal court’s role
Alberta Court of Appeal’s prior family cases
Here are some other recent family law decisions from the Court of Appeal of Alberta.
On Sept. 29, the appeal court dismissed a former husband’s application to stay the enforcement of an order for him to pay more than $177,700, comprising retroactive child support and expenses, ongoing monthly child support, and costs.
In a proposed appeal of a consent property judgment between former spouses, the appeal court issued an Apr. 23 decision denying permission to appeal on the grounds of the ex-wife’s incapacity to understand and accept the terms and/or ineffective assistance of counsel.
Enjoy this story? Read the latest family law news on the main page!
