European Court of Justice sides with IKEA in infringement bout over brand’s use in Belgian campaign

Court found that the campaign may have significantly harmed the furniture company’s reputation

European Court of Justice sides with IKEA in infringement bout over brand’s use in Belgian campaign
By Jacqueline So
Sep 08, 2026 / Share

The European Court of Justice has determined that Belgian far-right and Flemish separatist party Vlaams Belang may have significantly harmed the reputation of furniture giant IKEA by using logos, signs, and imagery mimicking the IKEA brand in a political campaign, reported The Associated Press.

The court released its decision on Tuesday September 8. This ruling will be considered in a Belgian court’s final judgment on the matter.

Vlaams Belang had rolled out an immigration-centered campaign entitled “IKEA Plan – Immigration Really Can Be Different” at a 2022 press conference. The campaign called for stricter immigration rules in Belgium in an IKEA-inspired presentation.

Subsequently, the furniture company filed an infringement action claiming the unlawful use of its trademarks in Belgian court. The Vrijheidsfonds association, which oversaw the campaign for Vlaams Belang, countered that freedom of expression rights covered its use of IKEA trademarks without the company’s consent.

The ECJ looked into the case on the Belgian court’s referral and found that the campaign’s use of the trademarks “may cause significant detriment to the repute of those trade marks and to the interests of their proprietor,” according to a statement published by AP News. It added that in order to be shielded by the right to freedom of expression, trademarks had to be used in good faith or in the public interest – neither of which seemed to be the case in Vlaams Belang’s campaign. Moreover, the court noted that using the trademarks to advertise a political stance did not trump IKEA’s rights and interests.

IKEA said that while it respected freedom of expression, the company did not condone the use of its branding in a way that negatively impacted its character.

“[Inter IKEA] cannot accept the use of the IKEA trademarks in ways that damage their reputation or distinctive character, particularly when such use serves no other purpose than to free-ride on the reputation of the IKEA brand,” the furniture giant said in a statement published by AP News.

Recently, a California state assembly member drafted a bill that would penalize content creators who do not disclose if they were paid to produce political content.

Related stories

UK Ministry of Justice confirms use of paid influencers for government campaigns Draft California bill sets penalties for influencers who keep mum on being paid for political ads