BC woman wins Provincial Court case against dentist for unauthorized and negligent dental work

She experienced months of physical and emotional distress post-treatment

BC woman wins Provincial Court case against dentist for unauthorized and negligent dental work

The BC Provincial Court has ruled in favour of Marie Harrison, awarding her compensation for severe pain and suffering due to unauthorized and negligent dental work performed by Dr. Kyle Nawrot.

The court’s judgment in Harrison v. Nawrot, 2024 BCPC 22 highlighted the critical issues of consent and adherence to professional standards in healthcare. Marie Harrison experienced months of physical and emotional distress, including severe pain, inability to eat properly, and social withdrawal due to the unsightly condition of her teeth post-treatment by Dr. Nawrot.

Harrison’s efforts to retrieve her dental records for corrective treatment met with obstruction, and she fell ill from medications prescribed by Nawrot. Harrison accused Nawrot of performing unnecessary work, exploiting her health benefits, and violating her through improper sedation, contributing to her ongoing mental anguish.

The court acknowledged Harrison’s struggle as a self-represented litigant in navigating the complexities of legal proceedings, emphasizing the necessity for clear, admissible evidence in such cases.

The court found Dr. Nawrot's admissions of professional misconduct, including poor communication with the BC College of Oral Health Professionals, substandard treatment, unjustified billing, and inadequate record-keeping, alongside Harrison's testimony, affirmed his negligence.

Although the court pointed out the importance of expert evidence in medical negligence cases to directly link the accused's actions to the harm suffered, Nawrot's admissions combined with Harrison's account proved a breach of care. The court pointed out that Nawrot’s breach was particularly evident in his unauthorized and extensive treatment in a single session.

The court recognized the emotional harm and stress Harrison endured from Nawrot's unauthorized procedures and negligence despite her not incurring financial losses for the dental work covered by her health benefits. The court concluded that Nawrot's failure to secure consent for the extensive treatments amounted to assault and battery.

In its decision, the court awarded Harrison a total of $15,551, covering general and aggravated damages for emotional suffering, loss of income due to her inability to work following the treatment, and court-related fees.

Recent articles & video

SCC confirms manslaughter convictions in case about proper jury instructions on causation

Law firm associate attrition continues to decline, NALP Foundation study shows

How systemizing law firm work allocation enhances diversity efforts and overcomes affinity bias

Dentons advises Saturn on $600 million acquisition of Saskatchewan oil assets

Ontario Court of Appeal upholds anesthesiologist’s liability in severe birth complications case

BC Supreme Court assigns liability in rear-end vehicle collision at Surrey intersection

Most Read Articles

BC Supreme Court rules for equal asset division in Port Alberni property dispute

BC Supreme Court rules vehicle owner and driver liable for 2011 Chilliwack collision

BC Supreme Court upholds solicitor-client privilege in medical negligence case

Petition to remove estate executor does not amount to ‘reprehensible conduct:’ BC Supreme Court