Manitoba considers legislation allowing municipalities to opt out of capital planning region

Provincial government intends to introduce legislation on local land use planning this fall

Manitoba considers legislation allowing municipalities to opt out of capital planning region

This fall, the Manitoba government intends to introduce new legislation that will allow municipalities to decide whether they wish to participate in the capital planning region process, Premier Wab Kinew and Municipal and Northern Relations Minister Ian Bushie recently announced.

Plan 20-50 was developed under the previous provincial government's Planning Amendment and City of Winnipeg Charter Amendment Act (Bill 37). The plan was designed to serve as a long-term strategy for Winnipeg and 18 surrounding municipalities.

Since then, the current provincial government has heard from representatives from municipalities and has chosen to proceed with legislation making membership in Plan 20-50 voluntary, Kinew said in a news release of the Manitoba government.

The current government is collaborating with communities such as Selkirk, Niverville, and Stonewall with the objective of advancing economic growth and housing development suiting the specific needs of communities, Kinew added.

“This is about giving municipalities the freedom to make their own planning decisions, rather than force them into a planning region that isn’t working,” said Kinew in the news release.

Bushie also criticized the former administration for pushing Bill 37 without working together with the affected municipalities. He emphasized the importance of hearing out and respecting local government and leaders, who could make their own decisions on behalf of their communities.

“We know the best way to build up communities across the province is to partner with them to help build up infrastructure, create more good jobs and invest in services like health care,” said Bushie in the news release. “Manitoba families want to see us work together to deliver for them and that’s what we’re going to do.”

Bushie added that the provincial government would share more information on the planned legislation upon its introduction before the house this fall.

Background of Bill 37

Bill 37 was part of the third session of the 42nd Manitoba Legislature. The bill sought to establish a capital planning region covering the Winnipeg metropolitan area, with other planning regions potentially being implemented through regulation.

According to the bill, a planning region should establish a regional planning by-law, which would guide land use planning for that region. More generally, the regional planning by-law would inform development plans, secondary plans, and zoning by-laws of the region’s planning districts and municipalities.

Regulation would establish the composition of the planning region’s municipal board, which should include at least one representative of each of the region’s municipalities, pursuant to the bill.

Under the bill, the municipal board would have the authority to consider appeals of land use decisions made by either a planning district, a municipality, or a planning commission. The municipal board would also have jurisdiction over claims that a planning district or a municipality failed to deal with an application in a timely manner.

Recent articles & video

KMB Law and Hoffer Adler LLP announce strategic merger

BC Supreme Court refuses to strike privacy claims of union official

Alberta Court of Appeal awards enhanced costs in child support appeal

BC Court of Appeal raises motor vehicle accident damages award to $417,000 from $385,500

Ontario Health Professions Appeal and Review Board declines to reprimand gynecologist

Nova Scotia Supreme Court discharges bankrupt with $484,000 debt to tax authority

Most Read Articles

Top 25 Most Influential Lawyers for 2024 unveiled by Canadian Lawyer

SCC will not hear appeals over Covid-19 vaccine travel mandate

Cozen O’Connor boosts ranks at Vancouver office with 13 Clark Wilson lawyers

Ontario Court of Appeal upholds $25-million counsel fee award in overtime class action