Women’s Legal Education and Action Fund welcomes 2021 budget’s attention to gender equality

Organization applauds investments to access to justice, fight against gender-based violence

Women’s Legal Education and Action Fund welcomes 2021 budget’s attention to gender equality

The Women’s Legal Education and Action Fund (LEAF) has praised the federal government’s $30-billion budgetary commitment to a national early learning and childcare system and other investments promoting women’s socioeconomic equality and supporting sexual violence survivors.

The federal government’s investments, which respond to feminist advocacy, will advance efforts to eradicate gender-based violence and to achieve gender equality, said LEAF in a public statement.

LEAF also expressed approval for the federal government’s budget commitment of $600 million over five years to advance its national action plan to end gender-based violence. More than $200 million aims to support gender-based violence organizations, while over $85 million is dedicated to a national initiative promoting independent legal advice and representation of sexual assault survivors and pilot programs for intimate partner violence survivors.

“Accessible independent legal advice and representation is crucial to helping survivors of sexual violence understand their options and their legal rights, as well as to navigate the justice system,” said Pam Hrick, executive director and general counsel of LEAF, in the news release.

LEAF worked alongside feminist organizations and advocates, led by Women’s Shelters Canada, to urge the federal government to develop and implement a fully funded and intersectional national action plan.

“We have seen the extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated women’s inequality in Canada,” said Hrick. “Women have been disproportionately driven out of the labour market and caught in the shadow pandemic of domestic violence,” and is especially true for those in historically marginalized communities, including Indigenous, trans and racialized women, she noted.

LEAF also welcomed investments in the Racialized Communities Legal Support Initiative, which will support legal education, and the revival of the Law Commission of Canada, which will offer independent expert legal advice to the federal government on matters of public interest. 

The national office of the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives also welcomed the budgetary commitments to child care, long-term care and pandemic support in a news release, including the clear targets for fee reduction in the child care system and the recognition of women and the care economy as central to the country’s economic recovery.

However, the centre said that the budget failed to appropriately address matters such as pharmacare, tax reform and climate change.

“Providing stimulus to ease Canada out of the pandemic recession is important, but the fact that we are yet again failing to protect citizens, essential workers and front-line staff from a devastating third wave shows now is not the time to limit our ambition,” said David Macdonald, the centre’s senior economist, in the news release.

Recent articles & video

Sarah Teich: Top 25 Most Influential Lawyer shares her fight for human rights

Alberta Court of King's Bench orders sale of estate lands, ending 30-year dispute among heirs

BC Supreme Court dismisses attempt to overturn spousal support agreement as abuse of process

Ontario Court of Appeal rejects extension to appeal medical malpractice case due to lack of merit

BC Supreme Court approves deductions for future benefits in PI case despite payment uncertainties

Arbitration Act bars appeal of court-appointed arbitrator: Ontario Court of Appeal

Most Read Articles

Federal Court rejects Canada Recovery Benefit claim due to insufficient evidence and missed hearing

BC Supreme Court rejects employer's attempt to move employment dispute to arbitration

Federal Court overrules denial of taxpayer relief due to procedural fairness breach

BC Supreme Court dismisses claim to waive solicitor-client privilege in family law dispute