COVID-19 and the courts: March 20 update

Today’s update for courthouses across Canada

COVID-19 and the courts: March 20 update

Courts across Canada have been taking extraordinary measures to control the spread of the new coronavirus COVID-19. Below is a roundup of actions courts are taking across the country.

Federal Court of Appeal
Notice regarding temporary suspension of filing deadlines

The court has announced additional measures, effective immediately. In accordance with rule 55 of the Federal Courts Rules, S.O.R./98-106 and the plenary power of the court to regulate proceedings before it, rule 6 is varied in all proceedings so that the period from Mar. 16 to Apr. 17 shall not be included in the calculation of time.

Those commencing appeals and applications under s. 27 and s. 28 of the Federal Courts Act are governed by mandatory deadlines. If circumstances prevent timely filing, parties may seek an extension of the deadlines after they expire. Judges will have to take into account this notice and the suspension period in exercising their discretion.

Instead of going to the registry to file paper documents, people are encouraged to file by email

to [email protected]. In cases of genuine urgency, people may also email a letter to the judicial administrator.

Saskatchewan
Court of Queen’s Bench for Saskatchewan

Court of Queen’s Bench Directive and Advisory as of March 19, 2020

Effective Mar. 20, regular operations are suspended. Until further notice, and in accordance with the procedures described in the directive and advisory linked above, only urgent and emergency matters will be heard by the court, and most of those will be heard by phone or video conference. In rare cases and subject to certain conditions, the court may hear matters where participants appear in person at the courthouse.

Nova Scotia
Provincial Court of Nova Scotia

COVID-19: Further Restrictions in Provincial Courts

The provincial court remains open, but only those persons required for the court proceedings can enter. Effective Mar. 19, people need not attend court in person unless the matter is related to an in-custody or urgent criminal matter, or an urgent family law or child or adult protection matter. With regard to criminal and youth criminal cases, if one is not in custody and has a court appearance between Mar. 19 and May 31, one should not attend court. Instead, the matter will be adjourned and rescheduled. For accused persons in custody, the court will make full use of video and audio technology wherever possible.

Nova Scotia Supreme Court
COVID-19: Supreme Court Adopts Essential Services Model

Unless ordered otherwise by the trial judge, any trials that are currently underway will continue until they conclude. All other proceedings will be limited to those deemed urgent or essential by the presiding justice. In relation to urgent or essential matters, judges will consider whether alternative measures, such as telephone or videoconferencing, may be used to hear those matters. Counsel are encouraged to do the same to reduce the number of people who need to appear in court in person. The measures described in the above linked essential services model will remain in place until further notice.

Nunavut
Nunavut Court of Justice

Covid-19 Emergency Closure Order — Iqaluit

Covid-19 Emergency Closure Orders — Communities

Effective Mar. 18, all court operations in the following courthouses have been suspended: Iqaluit (until further notice), Arviat (until May 31), Baker Lake (until May 31), Cambridge Bay (until May 31), Cape Dorset (until May 31), Gjoa Haven (until May 31), Kimmirut (until May 31), Kugaaruk (until May 31), Kugluktuk (until May 31), Pangnirtung (until May 31), Pond Inlet (until May 31), Rankin Inlet (until May 31), Sanikliuaq (until May 31) and Taloyoak (until May 31).

Recent articles & video

Exclusion of casino managers from Quebec’s labour regime constitutional: SCC

Yukon Supreme Court orders release of student contact information in class action lawsuit

Ontario Superior Court rejects worker's psychological impairment claim from a workplace injury

BC Supreme Court clarifies when spousal and child support obligations should end

Federal Court of Appeal rejects employee's complaint of union's failure to fairly represent him

Alberta Court of King's Bench rejects Calderbank offer in medical negligence case

Most Read Articles

BC Supreme Court upholds mother’s will against son's claims for greater inheritance

BC Supreme Court clarifies when spousal and child support obligations should end

2024 Canadian Law Awards Excellence Awardees revealed

Jennifer King at Gowling WLG on ESG and being recognized as a Top 25 Most Influential Lawyer