Cyber risk – is your law firm protected?

Cyber risk – is your  law firm protected?

Sponsored by

Essentially, cyber risk means any risk of financial loss, business disruption or damage to the reputation of a law firm from some form of failure of information technology systems.

Law firms are targets

Law firms are attractive targets to hackers due to their vast repositories of sensitive data, often containing clients’ most intimate personal and business details.  Most law firms do not view themselves as being potential targets and therefore, their IT-security defences are low, making them easy prey for cyber criminals.

The consequences

Confidential information that may be obtained during a breach of information security can result in the use of that information for fraud, identity theft, extortion against the law firm, and defamation. Sharing of that information over social media sites may result in breach of privacy or provide further access into the law firm’s private records. 

Simply being accused of a cyber-breach can negatively impact a law firm and its lawyers both professionally and financially.  Losing control of confidential information can quickly undermine a firm’s reputation, destroying clients’ and public trust.

Ignorance can be expensive

Often, firms assume that since cyber liability is a form of theft, they are covered by the theft and criminal activity coverage in their existing policies. Unfortunately, this is not the case and this misunderstanding has left firms responsible for resulting expenses related to cyber liability. These costs can include the management of the incident, the investigation of the cause, legal costs, regulatory fines, third party damages and costs associated with the mandatory notification to affected parties.

What to look for in coverage

Policies vary but should include coverage for expenses incurred as a direct or indirect result of a breach of privacy, including legal and public relations expenses, cyber extortion, and business interruption.

Recent articles & video

Exclusion of casino managers from Quebec’s labour regime constitutional: SCC

Yukon Supreme Court orders release of student contact information in class action lawsuit

Ontario Superior Court rejects worker's psychological impairment claim from a workplace injury

BC Supreme Court clarifies when spousal and child support obligations should end

Federal Court of Appeal rejects employee's complaint of union's failure to fairly represent him

Alberta Court of King's Bench rejects Calderbank offer in medical negligence case

Most Read Articles

BC Supreme Court upholds mother’s will against son's claims for greater inheritance

Five firms dominating M&A activity in Canada in recent years

First Nation's land entitlement claim statute-barred, but SCC finds treaty breach by Crown

BC Supreme Court dismisses shopping mall slip and fall case due to inexcusable delay