Dispute outcomes not always good for ‘lawyered-up’ employees

Law Society says UK election is a pivotal moment for justice…

Dispute outcomes not always good for ‘lawyered-up’ employees

Dispute outcomes not always good for ‘lawyered-up’ employees
Hiring a lawyer for an employment dispute may not bring the best outcome for the employee according to a new study.

The University of Illinois study found that, when disputes are handled through arbitration may find that the benefits of retaining counsel are almost cancelled out by the often-greater legal capabilities of ‘deep-pocketed’ employers.

“There’s this idea that employers are sometimes perceived as unleveling the playing field by taking advantage of the institutional structure of arbitration,” said J. Ryan Lamare, a professor of labour and employment relations at Illinois. “One of the counterarguments to that is employees don’t have to go it alone in arbitration. They think they can hire an attorney who can essentially level the playing field. But there are pitfalls to that strategy, too.”

Lamare’s research involving almost 20 years of case history, found that employees only benefit from hiring a lawyer when their employer did not; and employers were favoured in cases when they retained counsel and the employee did not.

In most of the other cases, the outcomes where both parties were represented by lawyers were similar to those where neither were.

Law Society says UK election is a pivotal moment for justice
The UK’s election next month should be seen as a pivotal moment for British justice according to the Law Society of England & Wales.

While Brexit is a key issue for whoever forms the next government, the society says that the rule of law and access to justice must also be prioritized following the cuts made by successive governments.

“Our legal system has long been seen as the global benchmark and our members fight the corner of some of the most vulnerable in society, including those struggling with mental health issues or personal hardship,” said Law Society president Simon Davis. “But there is a crisis, and there are things that urgently need fixing in our justice system. The party that wins this election needs to focus on this or we will lose something fundamental.”

The society is calling for the next government to review legal aid provisions and ensure the UK’s relationship with the EU allows lawyers to continue to practise and be based in the EU.

Recent articles & video

CIBC did not discriminate against ex-employee based on his disability and heterosexuality, FCA rules

BC Supreme Court mandates DNA test to determine plaintiff’s claim in will dispute

Privacy Commissioner urges stronger privacy protections amid concerns over federal data tools

Alberta Court of Appeal grants leave to appeal in Indigenous child guardianship dispute

Federal Court criticizes failure to address risk claims of Swahili Muslim refugees

BC Provincial Court dismisses dental negligence claim over lack of expert evidence

Most Read Articles

SCC says Criminal Code changes bar judge from imposing driving ban on man who killed two with truck

Canadian Lawyer unveils Top Litigation Boutiques in Canada for 2024-25

BC Supreme Court mandates DNA test to determine plaintiff’s claim in will dispute

Making companies accountable for ESG and DEI