Ontario Labour minister announces workplace violence ‘tool box’

Ontario Labour minister announces workplace violence ‘tool box’

Partners in Prevention 2010, Ontario’s newest health and safety trade show and conference, kicked off May 4 with the Ministry of Labour announcing the availability of the workplace violence tool box to help organizations comply with the requirements of Bill 168, a new legislation amending the Occupational Health and Safety Act to include workplace violence-specific requirements.

Speaking at the opening ceremonies, Ontario Labour Minister Peter Fonseca said the workplace violence tool box would help employers assess and control risks of violence in the workplace.

“By preventing injuries and creating healthier workplaces, businesses are more productive and create a more prosperous Ontario,” said Fonseca.

Bill 168, which takes effect June 15, requires employers to develop workplace violence and harassment policies and programs, and provide information and training to workers on the content of those programs.

The amendments also require employers to assess the risks of violence at their workplace, and take reasonable precautions to protect workers from possible domestic violence in the workplace.

Under the new bill, workers have the right to refuse work if they are at risk of physical injury from workplace violence, said Fonseca.

The workplace violence tool box contains forms that will help employers get started on their Bill 168 compliance.

It includes sample forms for conducting a workplace-violence survey, a checklist for policy, program and training review, a general form for conducting a physical environment assessment, and a risk-factor selection tool to help employers identify risks specific to their workplace. The workplace violence tool box can be found on the Ministry of Labour’s web site.

Fonseca also talked about the recently formed panel to review Ontario’s occupational health and safety system of prevention and enforcement, which he announced earlier this year, following a number of construction accidents that occurred late last year.

“I have every confidence that the recommendations we receive from this expert panel will go a long way to improving health and safety in provincially regulated workplaces,” he said.

Tony Dean, a University of Toronto professor of public policy and governance and chairman of the panel reviewing Ontario’s OHS system, also spoke at the opening ceremony.

Dean emphasized the importance of consulting with the health and safety community to get the best results and deliver the best recommendations for improvements in the province.

The panel will look at issues such as entry-level safety training, the impact of the underground economy on health and safety practices, and using existing legislation and programs to better promote worker safety.

The expert advisory panel is expected to report on its recommendations to the Ministry of Labour this fall.

Partners in Prevention 2010 was presented by the Ontario Prevention System partners, the four organizations that make up the 12 newly amalgamated health and safety associations in Ontario: Health and Safety Association for Government Services, Infrastructure Health and Safety Association, Safe Workplace Promotion Services Ontario, and Workplace Safety North.

Recent articles & video

Saskatchewan appeal court overturns order letting father have daughter vaccinated against her wishes

How to attract and retain Gen Z legal talent: Walk the walk on diversity

We need your insight on the best pro bono firms in Canada

Federal appellate court heard Rogers’ acquisition of Shaw, access to Parole Board records this week

Doctors not negligent despite delay in performing medical procedure on patient: BC Supreme Court

Manitoba reduces interprovincial trade barriers

Most Read Articles

Robust regulatory scheme likely saved Canadian crypto trading platforms from FTX fallout: lawyer

Roundup of law firm hires, promotions, departures: Jan. 23, 2023 update

New trust reporting rules to take effect in 2023 taxation year

SCC hears case about how administrative tribunals determine jurisdiction