‘Sad’ case over in man’s complaint against 7 N.S. lawyers

The Supreme Court of Canada has denied a leave to appeal arguing that the laws governing Nova Scotia’s legal profession are unconstitutional.

The appellant in Tupper v. Nova Scotia Barristers Society (Tribunal),  had been ordered to pay non-pecuniary damages after a motor vehicle accident.

Thomas Percy Tupper retained several lawyers over the ensuing years for a string of lawsuits he launched. He believed several of those lawyers, together with the plaintiff involved in the motor vehicle accident case, had conspired in an insurance fraud scheme against him.

He complained to the Nova Scotia Barristers Society against seven lawyers, with a view to having them disbarred. This complaint was dismissed Feb. 21, 2012, by an NSBS review subcommittee.

Tupper then argued at the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal in January, that the court’s lack of jurisdiction to hear an appeal from a decision of the review subcommittee was a breach of constitutional law.

He claimed the Legal Profession Act and the regulations governing the handling of complaints against lawyers in Nova Scotia breached the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms as well as the Constitution Act. He argued the act and regulations treated lawyers differently from non-lawyers.

In a written decision, Justice Jill Hamilton said the appeal court was “satisfied” the constitutional issue raised by Tupper “has no substance.” The appeal was dismissed without costs.

Three months later, Tupper applied for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court, which today denied leave without costs.

“It’s really easy to suggest there are constitutional issues around many things, but there wasn’t ever a lot of merit in this,” says Nova Scotia Barristers Society executive director Darrel Pink.

The case was a “sad” matter involving an appellant who was “not a vexatious litigant” and “believes in his absolute heart that something was done to deprive him of all the rights that he should have had,” Pink added.

The society did not ask for costs. Fees related to self-represented litigants such as Tupper are “the cost of doing business in a law society today,” says Pink.

Free newsletter

The Canadian Legal Newswire is a FREE weekly newsletter that keeps you up to date on news and analysis about the Canadian legal scene. A separate InHouse Edition is delivered every two weeks, providing targeted news and information of interest to in-house counsel.

Please complete the form below to receive the weekly Canadian Legal Newswire and/or the Canadian Inhouse Legal Newswire.

Recent articles & video

Dentons plan for “truly national” US firm passes votes

Legal departments should expect M&A deals to take longer

Airbnb reaches settlement in class action with Quebec users

Trial delays in personal injury disputes add insult to injury

Field Law’s competition for charitable funds creates a unique pro bono opportunity

One chance if by land, two if by sea for refugees

Most Read Articles

B.C. raising hourly rate for legal aid lawyers

Trial delays in personal injury disputes add insult to injury

Airbnb reaches settlement in class action with Quebec users

One chance if by land, two if by sea for refugees