American Bar Association issues new ethics guidance for public lawyers

ABA provides guidance on how disqualification rules apply to current and former government lawyers

American Bar Association issues new ethics guidance for public lawyers

The American Bar Association's (ABA) Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility has released a formal opinion guiding how disqualification rules apply to current and former government lawyers under the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct.

Formal Opinion 509 interprets Model Rule 1.11, which delineates the conflict-of-interest provisions that govern the professional conduct of lawyers who have served or are currently serving as government employees or officers. The essence of Rule 1.11, particularly paragraph (c), is to mitigate the potential misuse of confidential government information that could disadvantage individuals whom the information concerns.

Confidential government information, defined by the model rules, “information that has been obtained under governmental authority and which, at the time this rule is applied, the government is prohibited by law from disclosing to the public or has a legal privilege not to disclose and which is not otherwise available to the public.”

The guidance emphasizes that Rule 1.11 concerns itself with “a lawyer who acquired confidential government information while the lawyer was employed by or an official of the government, regardless of whether the lawyer seeking to represent the private client has now left government employ or office or maintains a private law practice (e.g., a part-time practice) while still in government employ or office.”

Formal Opinion 509 explicates the broad application of this rule, encompassing various scenarios where conflicts of interest may arise. This includes lawyers in private practice appointed as special prosecutors who also represent private clients, part-time prosecutors or attorneys general with private practices, and those engaged as counsel for towns or municipalities alongside their private client responsibilities.

This opinion is part of the ABA's ongoing efforts to provide clear, practical guidance to legal professionals. Through these formal opinions, the ABA seeks to aid lawyers, courts, and the public in interpreting and applying the model ethics rules to the specific challenges and dilemmas faced in legal practice, client-lawyer relationships, and judicial conduct.

Recent articles & video

Legal profession approaching genAI with hesitancy, but also excitement: Thomson Reuters report

Manitoba Chief Justice Marianne Rivoalen on going digital and what informs her judicial philosophy

The search is on for the Top 25 Most Influential Lawyers

Law Society of Manitoba issues guidelines to help lawyers navigate generative AI in practice

National Council for Reconciliation Act officially becomes law

Ontario Superior Court emphasizes estate trustee must account for trust property

Most Read Articles

BC Court of Appeal upholds monthly spousal support for ex-RCMP officer despite claims of hardship

Ontario Court of Appeal dismisses malpractice suit over child who was assaulted after doctor visit

Ontario Court of Appeal restores owner's right to repurchase property after initial buyback fails

Ontario Superior Court emphasizes estate trustee must account for trust property