Chief Justice Godfrey Chidyausiku of Zimbabwe

Justice Godfrey Chidyausiku was sworn in as acting chief justice of Zimbabwe in mid-March 2001. In August 2001, he was appointed substantively as the chief justice.

 

Immediately prior to these appointments Justice Chidyausiku reportedly shocked lawyers in Zimbabwe with his conduct; while still judge president of the High Court, he had purported to vary a Supreme Court ruling.

 

The previous chief justice, Anthony Gubbay, had ruled against peasant farmer Samson Mhuriro and 26 co-applicants who wanted the court to prevent the owners of the farms they had invaded from evicting them. Their application was dismissed.

 

Despite this, Chidyausiku at the High Court granted Mhuriro 15 days to put together a class action on behalf of peasant occupiers of all commercial farms. The Supreme Court overruled his decision. Chidyausiku then used his opening of the 2001 Bulawayo High Court session to defend publicly his own judgment and criticize the Supreme Court for nullifying his decision.

 

This was clearly in contravention of the constitution which gives precedence to the chief justice and the Supreme Court.

 

A commentator in the Zimbabwe Independent noted at the time: “Goddie has become blinded by his allegiance to [ruling party] Zanu-PF that it is difficult to imagine him being impartial when presiding in a case in which the party or its government is a contestant.”

Recent articles & video

SCC orders Ontario and Canada to negotiate with First Nation on unpaid Treaty annuities

Credit curtailment, consolidation among impacts of SCC’s Redwater decision for oil and gas: lawyers

Canadian consumer insolvencies at highest in almost five years

The BoC is cutting, but has its pivot come too late?

Proactive approach needed for ‘huge change’ coming to GAAR tax law: Dentons

Ontario Superior Court grants father parenting schedule despite abuse and substance use allegations

Most Read Articles

BC Supreme Court grants limited spousal support due to economic hardship in 21-year marriage

Alberta court allows arbitration award to be entered as judgment in matrimonial dispute

State can be liable for damages for passing unconstitutional laws that infringe Charter rights: SCC

Lawyer suing legal regulator for discrimination claims expert witness violated practice standards