Competition Bureau will not appeal Vancouver Airport Authority case

Commissioner says ruling helps clarify the law

Competition Bureau will not appeal Vancouver Airport Authority case

The Competition Bureau announced that it will not be appealing the Competition Tribunal’s decision to dismiss an application against the Vancouver Airport Authority.

In a statement released on Nov. 20, Commissioner of Competition Matthew Boswell said, “Although the Tribunal dismissed our application, the ruling provides valuable jurisprudence and helps to clarify certain aspects of the law.”

The Competition Tribunal dismissed its application for an order to prohibit the Vancouver Airport Authority from committing allegedly anti-competitive acts. In the commissioner’s application with the tribunal, he argued that VAA’s acts of limiting the number of in-flight catering service providers and excluding new entrants amounted to anti-competitive conduct that prevented or lessened competition substantially.

In its decision, which was rendered on Oct. 17, the tribunal disagreed with the commissioner’s argument. While VAA substantially or completely controls the supply of galley handling services at the Vancouver International Airport, it has a legitimate business justification for engaging in the allegedly exclusionary conduct. The tribunal dismissed the commissioner’s application with costs.

Still, in the Nov. 20 statement, Boswell expressed his approval of the tribunal’s confirmation that not-for-profit and regulated entities, like VAA, are not considered exempt from complying with s. 79 of the Competition Act, RSC 1985, c C-34.

“Going forward, the Bureau will continue to vigorously enforce these provisions of the Act,” Boswell said. “This includes taking enforcement action, where appropriate, against regulated entities that are engaged in anti-competitive conduct.”

Recent articles & video

'We need to have the competence to question:' LegalTech panel on genAI fakes in the legal system

MPD Law Firm LLP appears in $20-million commercial case

BC court orders new hearing on worker’s mental disorder claim due to expert's incomplete information

Tax Court of Canada rules against additional 15 percent tax on dividends to Luxembourg shareholders

BC Supreme Court rejects husband’s claim against wife’s counsel over family home sale proceeds

Ontario Superior Court dismisses medical malpractice lawsuit due to lack of expert evidence

Most Read Articles

Survey shows many Canadians not keeping track of financial information crucial for estate planning

Sharing news website subscription password not copyright infringement, finds Federal Court

Lawyer salaries may vary more in wake of competition law changes: recruiter report

Jennifer Teskey, the Canadian managing partner at Norton Rose Fulbright, on talent and motivation