Federal government releases regulations on harassment and violence training

Ottawa playing catch up with provincial requirements by making training mandatory

Federal government releases regulations on harassment and violence training
Barry Kuretzky is a labour lawyer at Littler Mendelson P.C. in Toronto.

Federally regulated companies will soon be required to investigate and provide training for workplace harassment and violence, including sexual harassment and sexual violence.

Ottawa made the announcement in late June that the requirements will take effect Jan. 1, 2021 when it published the Workplace Harassment and Violence Prevention Regulations for Bill C-65, which set out the requirements for federally regulated employers under the Canada Labour Code. The CLC was part of a federal overhaul of labour laws passed in late 2018.

“I find it surprising that they've been so late to the game on such an important piece of legislation,” says Barry Kuretzky, a labour lawyer at Littler Mendelson P.C. in Toronto. “We've had similar regimes for a long time in Ontario and, in particular, there were amendments in September of 2016 which put in very similar training regulations.”

The regulations require employers to take certain steps jointly with their policy committee or their workplace committee or their health and safety representative; however, if they cannot jointly agree on a required step, the employer’s decision will prevail.

Kuretzky says the mandatory training is the most significant new requirement, although many federally regulated companies such as media companies and banks already have very similar policies.

“These are fundamentally, absolutely important issues,” Kuretzky says. “By having the legislation, by having the training, and the training is key, it brings to the workplace an understanding, both from managers and supervisors, and to the employees, what their rights are.”

The regulations outline the essential elements of a workplace harassment and violence prevention policy, including timeframes for resolution; confidentiality requirements; protection for employees victimized by a third party; qualifications of a person to investigate and provide recommendations; employer obligations to implement corrective measures; an outline of existing and new roles of the workplace committee and the support to be provided for employees who have experienced workplace harassment and violence.

“What the government is putting forth [now] is not foreign to Canadian employers,” says Kuretzky. “Even if you are not in a regime which legislates, most, even small, employers have taken [these issues] into account because there's been such positive publicity and from all regimes that this is inappropriate behavior in the workplace, that companies are doing the training, they're on top of the training.”

The changes to workplace sexual harassment and violence regulations were part of a larger change to the federal regime meant to adapt workplaces to the modern, often precarious, economy. Several changes made to the Canada Labour Code took effect in September 2019, including a new leave for victims of family violence of up to 10 days.

Related stories

Free newsletter

The Canadian Legal Newswire is a FREE newsletter that keeps you up to date on news and analysis about the Canadian legal scene. A separate InHouse Edition is delivered on a regular basis, providing targeted news and information of interest to in-house counsel.

Please enter your email address below to subscribe.

Recent articles & video

Virtual arbitral hearings: Arbitrations are proceeding remotely with ‘enormous financial savings’

Canada’s top Wills, Trusts, & Estates boutiques for 2021 revealed

Changes to IP laws offers an easier path to industrial design protection, says Oyen Wiggs lawyer

University of Manitoba business law clinic aims to help entrepreneurs, innovators strapped for cash

Expediting the COVID response: how intellectual property regulators and tribunals have stepped up

More work needed to end violence against Indigenous women, LEAF says about Gladue retrial

Most Read Articles

Calgary lawyer Jeff Kahane could have bought carbon credits, but instead purchased land in B.C.

Manitoban on disability assistance wins right to appeal being forced to go on Old Age Pension at 65

Canadian Judicial Council to take no further action on matter of Quebec Superior Court chief justice

McLeish Orlando’s Lindsay Charles reflects on her journey to becoming a partner at the firm