Litigant filed more than 60 applications and appeals since 2015
The Alberta Court of Appeal has denied a vexatious litigant’s permission to appeal the order declaring that he was a vexatious litigant.
In Rana v. Rana, 2022 ABCA 306, Salim Rana sued his brother Zahir Rana, who represented their mother who had dementia. The dispute arose from a promissory note allegedly signed by the mother in 2014. Zahir managed their mother’s financials at the time, which was also the subject of the litigation.
Salim was involved in over 60 applications and appeals since 2015 and was declared a vexatious litigant in 2022. He had previously sought permission to appeal the order, which was allowed on a narrow issue of procedure, which required Zahir to comply with notice to the Minister of Justice and the Solicitor General of a vexatious litigant.
Zahir applied to vary the order after complying with this requirement. The appellate court granted the application and varied the order on the basis that failure to notify the Minister had no substantive impact on the vexatious litigant order.
Salim sought permission to appeal this variation order on the same ground of non-compliance.
The appellate court dismissed the appeal.
Vexatious litigant requires permission to appeal
The test for permission to appeal requires the applicant to show an important question of law or precedent, a reasonable chance of success on appeal, and that the delay will not hinder the progress of the action or cause undue prejudice, said the court.
In this case, Salim “clearly [failed] to meet any of the three parts of the test for permission to appeal,” said the court. The decision had rectified the failure to give notice and rendered the previous decision granting permission to appeal moot, said the court.
As such, the appellate court dismissed the application for permission to appeal and ordered costs in favour of Zahir.