Fighting the good fight in ‘David & Goliath’ litigation

Bogoroch & Associates’ Heidi Brown on firm values, access to justice and challenging med mal cases

Fighting the good fight in ‘David & Goliath’ litigation
Heidi Brown says a large part of Bogoroch & Associates’ value system is practising gratitude

Sponsored content

When Richard Bogoroch approached her with a job offer, Heidi Brown was ready for a new challenge. After seven years at the Office of the Childrens Lawyer, she could think of no better way to further her passion for access to justice than by training under the tutelage of one of the leading plaintiff personal injury and medical malpractice lawyers who, in late 1999, was launching his own firm.

The two met when the latter assisted the OCL as outside counsel on behalf of injured children. Bogoroch recognized Brown as a likeminded champion for injured clients and invited her to come aboard to help build a firm in that image — and the rest, as they say, is history.

Starting out with just three lawyers and a commitment to excellence in the fields of personal injury and medical malpractice, Bogoroch & Associates LLP has grown to 12 lawyers and counting. Brown, who has been with the firm for 21 years and is now a partner, is proud to have been involved since the firms inception.

We wanted to practice personal injury at the highest level and medical malpractice is certainly that,” she says. We are all highly motivated people. When you decide to practice litigation, you have to strive to be the best that you can be.”

Bogoroch — whom she calls brilliant, committed and passionate about the practice of personal injury law” —  runs the firm collaboratively, not in silos. The teamwork model is their preferred way to practice given the  demands of a busy litigation practice, Brown says, adding the firm is a meritocracy — they rely on and support each other and pride themselves on excellent client service and communication. While COVID-19 has made it challenging to see clients face-to-face, regular Zoom meetings, phone calls and email communication with clients has, in many ways, enhanced lawyer-client communication. Brown even gets texts on her private phone now, adding its all about being accessible and making sure clients know theyre there for them.

Moving cases quickly and efficiently is also a core value of Bogoroch & Associates — a client shouldnt have to wait for years after a car accident to get their case resolved. From time to time, Brown says the firm is asked to take over cases where many years have elapsed since the accident and the action has not even reached the examination for discovery stage.

That is not how we practice law at our firm — that is abhorrent to us,” Brown says. “We aim to  issue a statement of claim within three to six months of becoming retained in motor vehicle accident and general tort claims. We further aim to get all the pieces in place so that most cases settle at a mediation within two to two-and-a-half years. If they dont have a catastrophic component to them, thats usually achievable.”

Browns practice is diverse and includes motor vehicle accidents, Occupiers’ Liability, long-term disability and product liability cases as well as medical and hospital malpractice cases. She calls medical malpracticea very David and Goliath type of litigation” as statistically approximately 80% of cases that do go to trial are won by the doctors who are represented by very capable litigators across the country, retained by the Canadian Medical Protective Association. Despite the odds, these tough cases are the ones that really get my juices going,” Brown says.

Theyre such interesting legal issues and medical issues — you have to be sharp on your legal skills and youve got to know the law.”

One of the most critical challenges in these cases is finding medical experts to opine on the issues of standard of care and causation, without which a case cannot succeed. Retaining experts is expensive and also requires a certain degree of skill and expertise to find doctors with the requisite credentials who are prepared to critique the care and treatment provided by their professional colleagues. Physicians must also be educated about the law, and moreover, creativity is also required to build a case from the ground up in a system thats weighted heavily in favour of the physicians,” Brown says.

In an access to justice context, medical malpractice has always been difficult for people because litigation is so expensive. A large part of the firms value system is practising gratitude, and for Brown working in this area is about wanting to give back because the system doesnt have a mechanism for it — theres no access to legal aid or any plan that finances medical malpractice cases.”

Its a big deficit in our justice system that people dont have the financial means to just get answers, which is often all they really want in addition to the compensation they badly need,” she says. We are grateful to have the means to provide clients with those answers, with peace of mind and knowledge they were malpracticed against and of course, to obtain for them the compensation they require and deserve. If youre in a position to give back you shouldn't hesitate — its a no-brainer.”

Having been on the board of the Ontario Trial Lawyers Association for eight years, Brown says she takes that role very seriously as an extension of what I do at the firm.” She enjoys all aspects of plaintiff personal injury, including "obtaining much needed compensation for people in crisis, using my creativity to build a persuasive case on behalf of my client, working with highly regarded and credentialed experts in the medical field and constantly learning both law and procedure to be the best that I can be.”

I feel strongly this is part of my mission as a lawyer,” she says.This is the grassroots kind of law that not only makes a difference but also brings meaning to my life.”

Recent articles & video

Investment boost, contract automation innovation among legal tech trends in 2022

Federal Court of Appeal affirms decision denying tax credits claimed by consulting firm

Medical negligence claim against unaffiliated physician not subject to CFL's collective agreement

Love an aggravating factor in murder; organized thinking contrasted with mental illness claim

Interpretation of 'eligible person' who can appeal a question of law: Alberta Court of Appeal

Ontario Court of Appeal overturns threshold of exceptionality in sentencing for insurance fraud

Most Read Articles

Violence a key factor in analyzing how mother's relocation is in children's best interests: SCC

Trudeau names new board members for next Supreme Court of Canada justice selection

The Depp/Heard trial provides the perfect argument against broadcasting court proceedings

McCarthy Tetrault LLP representing Royal Bank of Canada in $8.5 million case