Federal Court approves $1.9 billion settlement for Indian Boarding Home Program survivors

The agreement's approval follows extensive litigation beginning in 2012

Federal Court approves $1.9 billion settlement for Indian Boarding Home Program survivors

The Federal Court has approved a $1.9 billion settlement agreement in a class action proceeding to compensate survivors of the Indian Boarding Home Program.

The program, initiated in 1951, removed approximately 40,000 Indigenous children from their families and placed them in non-Indigenous homes to attend elementary and high school. Many of these children suffered physical, sexual, and verbal abuse and were forbidden from practicing their culture and speaking their languages.

The settlement provides for two classes of individuals. The “Primary Class” includes those placed in private homes for school attendance from September 1, 1951, to June 30, 1992. Students placed after this period may still qualify if they prove they were placed before responsibility for their education transferred from Canada to an Indigenous governing body. The “Family Class” covers individuals with derivative claims arising from family relationships with Primary Class members.

The agreement's approval follows extensive litigation beginning in 2012 and involves significant input from survivors. Notable voices include Kenneth Weistche, Reginald Percival, and Annie Irene Trapper Weistche, among others, who recounted their traumatic experiences during the settlement approval hearing.

Key terms of the settlement include compensation for loss of culture and abuse. Category 1 compensation offers $10,000 to all class members, while Category 2 provides additional payments ranging from $10,000 to $200,000 based on the severity of the abuse. The claims process is designed to be simple and non-adversarial, with all claims made on paper to minimize re-traumatization.

The settlement also establishes a $50 million Indigenous-led foundation to support healing, wellness, education, and cultural programs for survivors and their descendants. The agreement emphasizes the need for mental health and emotional support services during the claims process, drawing on lessons from past settlements.

Class counsel and Quebec subclass counsel endorsed the settlement. The Federal Court highlighted the importance of proper notice, identification of class members, and sufficient resources to help them file their claims.

Recent articles & video

SCC orders Ontario and Canada to negotiate with First Nation on unpaid Treaty annuities

Credit curtailment, consolidation among impacts of SCC’s Redwater decision for oil and gas: lawyers

Canadian consumer insolvencies at highest in almost five years

The BoC is cutting, but has its pivot come too late?

Proactive approach needed for ‘huge change’ coming to GAAR tax law: Dentons

Ontario Superior Court grants father parenting schedule despite abuse and substance use allegations

Most Read Articles

BC Supreme Court grants limited spousal support due to economic hardship in 21-year marriage

Alberta court allows arbitration award to be entered as judgment in matrimonial dispute

State can be liable for damages for passing unconstitutional laws that infringe Charter rights: SCC

Lawyer suing legal regulator for discrimination claims expert witness violated practice standards