Federal Court orders judicial recount in Paul First Nation Council Election over unaccounted votes

The failure to include certain mail-in ballots in the recount likely affected the election's outcome

Federal Court orders judicial recount in Paul First Nation Council Election over unaccounted votes

In a recent ruling, the Federal Court has mandated a judicial recount in the election for a council position within the Paul First Nation, Alberta, after discovering discrepancies in the vote count.

This decision comes after William House contested the election results, which initially declared Delores G. Rain as the winner by a single vote following a recount. The election, overseen by electoral officer Drew Shaw from the firm One Feather in Victoria, ended in controversy when it was revealed that some mail-in ballots, received after Shaw had left for Paul First Nation from Victoria, were not included in the recount. Despite House's request for another recount upon discovering the oversight, Shaw declined, citing the formal proclamation of the results.

The Federal Court, in a detailed judgment, underscored the importance of every vote being counted accurately, stating the failure to include certain mail-in ballots in the recount likely affected the election's outcome. As a remedy, the court ordered a judicial recount of votes for House and Rain, emphasizing the integrity of the electoral process.

The case brought attention to the procedural intricacies of the First Nations Elections Act and its regulations, especially regarding the handling of mail-in ballots and the notification of election processes to off-reserve members. While the court acknowledged a breach in notifying some off-reserve members, it concluded this did not influence the election result.

The recount will be conducted under the supervision of a judge, without the need for the electoral officer from One Feather, to ensure transparency and fairness. This approach aims to respect the electoral process's integrity while minimizing judicial intervention.

The Federal Court highlighted the critical nature of adhering to electoral laws and regulations to maintain trust in democratic processes. The court further emphasized the judiciary's role in upholding electoral fairness and the importance of every vote in determining election outcomes.

Recent articles & video

SCC confirms manslaughter convictions in case about proper jury instructions on causation

Law firm associate attrition continues to decline, NALP Foundation study shows

How systemizing law firm work allocation enhances diversity efforts and overcomes affinity bias

Dentons advises Saturn on $600 million acquisition of Saskatchewan oil assets

Ontario Court of Appeal upholds anesthesiologist’s liability in severe birth complications case

BC Supreme Court assigns liability in rear-end vehicle collision at Surrey intersection

Most Read Articles

BC Supreme Court rules for equal asset division in Port Alberni property dispute

BC Supreme Court rules vehicle owner and driver liable for 2011 Chilliwack collision

BC Supreme Court upholds solicitor-client privilege in medical negligence case

Petition to remove estate executor does not amount to ‘reprehensible conduct:’ BC Supreme Court