Around fifteen law firms appeared in the commercial lists this week
Drudi, Alexiou, Kuchar LLP lawyer Tushar Sabharwal represented the plaintiffs in the commercial case with the highest concerned amount this week, while 15 law firms in total appeared in Commercial List cases this week.
The most notable commercial case this week is 1392798 Ontario Ltd. et al v. 2437209 Ontario Inc. et al with a concerned amount of $2 million. Drudi, Alexiou, Kuchar LLP lawyer Tushar Sabharwal represented the plaintiffs while the respondents appear to be unrepresented. Sabharwal’s practice includes construction litigation, real estate litigation, estate litigation and employment litigation.
15 different law firms before the Commercial List
Blaney McMurtry LLP partner Eric Golden represented the applicant in The Toronto-Dominion Bank v. The Urban Environment Centre (Toronto) et al. Golden’s commercial litigation practice includes banking and PPSA matters, shareholder disputes, class actions, commercial leasing and other forms of contractual disputes, real estate litigation, fraud, and defence of professional negligence claims against lawyers in commercial matters.
Corsianos Law partner Terry Corsianos represented applicant J. Matas in Zaman et al v. Voreon Inc. et al. Corsianos’ practice includes complex commercial litigation, debt collection actions, and real estate law.
Coutts Crane lawyer Caitlin Dale represented plaintiff 2043102 Ontario Limited in 2043102 Ontario Limited v. Eminence Living Inc. Dale’s practice primarily focuses on civil litigation, family law, and employment law.
Dickinson Wright LLP partner David Preger represented plaintiff Owemanco Mortgage Holding Corporation in Owemanco Mortgage Holding Corporation v. Concept Lofts Ltd. et al. Preger’s practice includes bankruptcy, insolvency, real estate and security enforcement, as well as construction, land development, municipal, condominium, finance, environmental and aboriginal law.
Drudi, Alexiou, Kuchar LLP lawyer Tushar Sabharwal represented plaintiffs 1392798 Ontario Ltd and one other in 1392798 Ontario Ltd. et al v. 2437209 Ontario Inc. et al. Sabharwal’s practice includes construction litigation, real estate litigation, estate litigation and employment litigation.
Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP partner Gerald Ranking represented defendant T. Murray in Grosvenor Park Media Fund LLP v. Arc Productions Ltd. et al. Ranking’s dispute resolution practice encompasses all aspects of civil, administrative and commercial litigation, with an emphasis on professional negligence, pensions, cross-border issues, franchise, banking, insurance, real estate, product liability and employment matters.
Kestenberg Siegal Lipkus LLP associate Thomas Slahta represented respondent Saba Ahmad Barrister Professional Corporation and one other in Zaman et al v. Voreon Inc. et al. Slahta’s practice focuses on complex commercial litigation, including insolvency and recovery, fraud, and professional negligence matters.
McCarthy Tétrault LLP partner Abbey (Junior) Sirivar represented R. Du and one other in Tianjin Dinghui Hongjun Equity Investment Partnership (Limited Partnership) v. Du et al. Sirivar provides strategic advice to domestic and international clients across a broad range of industries including mining, financial services, telecommunications and healthcare in complex disputes.
McMillan LLP associate Guneev Bhinder represented applicant Tianjin Dinghui Hongjun Equity Investment Partnership (Limited Partnership) in Tianjin Dinghui Hongjun Equity Investment Partnership (Limited Partnership) v. Du et al. Bhinder’s broad commercial litigation practice focuses on complex disputes in banking and finance, securities litigation, arbitration and corporate governance and insolvency matters.
Miller Thomson LLP partner David Ward represented the multiple applicants in Cannapiece Group Inc., Cannapiece Corp., Cannapiece Craft Growers Corp., 2666222 Ontario Ltd., 2580385 Ontario Inc. and 2669673 Ontario Inc. v. Marzili. Ward’s insolvency practice focuses on creditors' rights and remedies in reorganizations and liquidations under Canada's major insolvency and corporate statutes.
Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP partner Larry Lowerstein represented S. McDonnell and several others in Grosvenor Park Media Fund LLP v. Arc Productions Ltd. et al. Lowerstein conducts a broad corporate, commercial and complex litigation practice including class actions, corporate governance, contested mergers and acquisitions, securities litigation, environmental liability, employment matters and franchising disputes.
Paliare Roland Rosenberg Rothstein LLP partner Chris Paliare represented plaintiff Grosvenor Park Media Fund LLP in Grosvenor Park Media Fund LLP v. Arc Productions Ltd. et al. Paliaire’s practice covers all aspects of counsel work, including appeals, complex corporate and commercial litigation, securities litigation, administrative law, public law, and class actions.
Peddle & Pollard LLP partner John Peddle represented respondent C. Marizli in Cannapiece Group Inc., Cannapiece Corp., Cannapiece Craft Growers Corp., 2666222 Ontario Ltd., 2580385 Ontario Inc. and 2669673 Ontario Inc. v. Marzili.
Rory McGovern PC partner Rory McGovern represented applicant S. Zaman in Zaman et al v. Voreon Inc. et al. McGovern’s practice is focused on civil litigation, class actions and franchise law.
Van Kralingen & Keenberg LLP partner Megan Keenberg represented respondent Voreon Inc. and one other in Zaman et al v. Voreon Inc. et al. Keenberg’s practice focuses on diverse complex commercial claims involving breach of contract, breach of fiduciary and/or statutory duties, negligence, fraud, civil conspiracy, regulatory compliance, professional liability and other commercial causes of action.
