Regulators toughening up on health-related advertising as misleading COVID claims abound

Companies must be careful of both literal claims and general impressions made by advertising: lawyer

Regulators toughening up on health-related advertising as misleading COVID claims abound
Alice Tseng is a regulatory lawyer at Smart & Biggar LLP.

Regulators are getting tough on false and misleading advertising claims associated with COVID-19, as the pandemic has been met with a flood of new products and new claims about existing products alleging protection against the virus.

Health Canada’s database on COVID-related health product advertising incidents shows that, as of May 28, there were 155 incidents of “illegal, false or misleading advertising of products claiming to mitigate, prevent, treat, diagnose or cure COVID-19.”

“That's a huge amount for them,” says Alice Tseng, a regulatory lawyer with a practice focussed on the pharmaceutical, cannabis, food, medical devices and cosmetics industries. Tseng is a partner at Smart & Biggar LLP.

Claims include that certain vitamins, foods or drinks will prevent COVID-19, as well as that certain ultra-violet and ozone air sterilization systems or other air purifiers will kill it. Health Canada has acted against labels boasting “a made in Canada solution to the coronavirus outbreak” and another that warned: “Do not expect common duct cleaning services to decontaminate to the degree required for peace-of-mind during this COVID-19 (coronavirus) quarantine."

During the pandemic, Tseng says she has experienced a steady increase in cold-calls from companies wanting to create or market a product — usually classified as a medical device — that leverages the public’s fear of COVID-19.

Other businesses have products which predate the pandemic but have now come under Health Canada’s scrutiny because given the product’s nature, the regulator believes Canadians will assume it is helpful against the virus, she says.

Tseng recently wrote in a firm blog that companies now must be extraordinarily careful because regulators tend to take a severe line with offences seen as targeting or taking unfair advantage of vulnerable groups. In the climate produced by the global pandemic, regulators view the entire Canadian public as vulnerable, Tseng writes.

“I think they really do think that the population generally is a lot more vulnerable. So, they are actually being stricter with respect to products and claims that have always been made.

“Health Canada has certainly been a lot more rigorous now than they have before.”

Tseng says companies need to be careful that they do not make claims about products which transform them from an unregulated into a regulated product or, if already regulated, that go beyond what’s permissible. For example, some masks are considered regulated medical devices and others are not, says Tseng. A typical cloth mask is not subject to medical device laws, and manufacturers are not allowed to make a COVID-19 claim about them. She adds that masks under the medical device regime are not necessarily all permitted to make COVID-19 claims either.

Because of the pandemic’s effect on public psychology, companies must be weary, not just of the literal claims they make about their products, but also the general impressions they elicit about them, says Tseng. For example, a product may advertise that it “kills germs” and does, in fact, kill germs. That product is regulated properly and, under normal circumstances, is entitled to promote that fact. But the pandemic has altered public expectations such that Health Canada will now assume consumers interpret the claim as promising effectiveness against COVID-19, she says.

“Right now, the assumption might be that it's good for COVID. But let's say the product is actually not good for COVID. And it's not good for any viruses. That could be considered misleading,” Tseng says.

Recent articles & video

BC Court of Appeal overturns ruling requiring disclosure of privileged information on birth alerts

Ontario Superior Court finds Ottawa negligent in response to Uber's entry, damaging taxi industry

BC Supreme Court upholds drivers' liability in car crash injuring cyclist

Ontario Superior Court orders child's return from Alberta in custody dispute

Alberta court rules expert evidence inadmissible following settlement in medical negligence case

New metric developed to assess socioeconomic challenges of US law school applicants

Most Read Articles

Alberta court refuses to stay bankruptcy proceedings in favour of family law proceedings

New CRA audit powers proposed in federal budget raise uncertainty, say Davies tax lawyers

Mergers and acquisitions in the AI space need unique due diligence considerations: Dentons lawyers

Poilievre's plan to trample Charter rights won't stop at tough-on-crime measures