Canadian Judicial Council inquiry committee recommends removal of Quebec judge Gérard Dugré

Dugré's conduct undermines public confidence to such an extent that he cannot sit as a judge: report

Canadian Judicial Council inquiry committee recommends removal of Quebec judge Gérard Dugré

An inquiry committee of the Canadian Judicial Council has recommended the removal of Quebec judge Gérard Dugré from office for his “aggressive and disagreeable” attitude in the courtroom and failure to render decisions on time.

Dugré has been a judge of the Superior Court of Quebec since 2009. The committee began investigating him when the CJC received complaints concerning his conduct on the bench. In particular, the complaints alleged that he made “inappropriate” remarks and comments at several court hearings and incurred delays in rendering judgment.

In its 285-page report, the committee unanimously found that Dugré acts constitute “serious judicial misconduct” and recommended his removal from office.

The committee determined that Dugré displayed an “aggressive and disagreeable” attitude towards lawyers, made “condescending, contemptuous, and inappropriate” remarks, and was “impolite” on certain occasions.

Moreover, the committee found that Dugré’s “chronic” failure to render judgment within a reasonable time threatens the integrity of the judge’s office and demonstrates his inability to fulfill his obligation to those who appeared before him.

“Ultimately, when viewed in context and considered as a whole, Justice Dugré’s conduct in the courtroom would cause a reasonable member of the public to have serious doubts about his ability to ensure a respectful climate conducive to the proper conduct of judicial matters,” the committee wrote.

The committee concluded that Dugré’s conduct undermines public confidence to such an extent that he has become “capacitated or disabled” from the due execution of the judge’s office within the meaning of s. 65(2) of the Judges Act.

According to CJC, a quorum of 17 council members will consider the report and, following deliberations, decide on the recommendation made to the justice minister.

Recent articles & video

Ontario Superior Court certifies class action against crypto asset trading platform Binance

NS Court of Appeal denies request for the production of CCTV footage in a personal injury action

NS Supreme Court clarifies disclosure standards in a divorce and property division case

Federal Court overturns study permit denial due to immigration officer’s unreasonable assessment

Ontario Court of Appeal dismisses stroke-related medical malpractice suit against physician

Military judges being subject to chain of command does not sacrifice independence, impartiality: SCC

Most Read Articles

BC Supreme Court orders father to pay fines for continuous breaches of conduct and parenting orders

Ontario Superior Court certifies class action against The Bank of Nova Scotia

Manitoba First Nations' class action seeks treaty annuity payments

BC Supreme Court revokes probate grant for failure to properly notify testator’s son in Mexico