Michael Feder

The Top 25 Most Influential 2019 winner

Michael Feder

Partner, McCarthy Tetrault, Vancouver

Michael Feder’s pro bono work has primarily focused on helping people with disabilities. Feder acted as lead counsel for persons with disabilities in S.A. v. Metro Vancouver Housing Corporation, 2019 SCC 4. In its decision, the SCC reversed the B.C. court’s decision and held that discretionary trusts widely used to provide financial support to persons with disabilities are not their assets and, therefore, do not generally affect their eligibility under social assistance programs. This is a significant decision for the disability community in Canada as the status of these trusts had never been addressed by the SCC. As lead counsel for the Council of Canadians with Disabilities, Feder brought a constitutional challenge to B.C. laws permitting involuntary treatment of people with mental disabilities without regard to their capacity. Pro bono clients are in good hands when they’re being represented by 2017’s British Columbia Litigator of the Year and one of the handful of lawyers to be appointed by the Chief Justice of Canada as amicus curiae.

Free newsletter

The Canadian Legal Newswire is a FREE weekly newsletter that keeps you up to date on news and analysis about the Canadian legal scene. A separate InHouse Edition is delivered every two weeks, providing targeted news and information of interest to in-house counsel.

Please complete the form below to receive the weekly Canadian Legal Newswire and/or the Canadian Inhouse Legal Newswire.

Recent articles & video

Daphne Dumont to receive CBA’s Cecilia I. Johnstone award

Quebec taking harsh line on cannabis edibles

Will the conversation catalyzed by the Law Society of Ontario mean the end of articling?

Copyright law: set for an overhaul?

Corporate Counsel Survey 2019 closes on Monday, Aug 26

When Legal Aid is a political prop, Access to justice suffers

Most Read Articles

Canadian Judicial Council seeks leave to SCC in Girouard case

The Ontario government is destroying university legal clinics

Quebec taking harsh line on cannabis edibles

Will the conversation catalyzed by the Law Society of Ontario mean the end of articling?