COVID-19 and the courts: March 31 update

Today’s update for courthouses across Canada

COVID-19 and the courts: March 31 update

Courts across Canada are taking extraordinary measures to control the spread of the new coronavirus COVID-19. Below is a roundup of actions courts are taking across the country.

British Columbia

Supreme Court of British Columbia

Notice — Suspension of all regular court operations — Civil and family matters
Effective Mar. 30, new changes have been made to the court’s operations in relation to civil and family proceedings.

Notice — Suspension of all regular court operations — Criminal proceedings
Effective Mar. 30, new changes have been made to the court’s operations in relation to criminal proceedings.

Applications under s. 490 of the Criminal Code (further detention of things seized) during the suspension of Supreme Court operations
The court has introduced certain changes to the procedures applicable to s. 490 applications while the health emergency persists. For instance, requests for the hearing of such applications will be done electronically, while the hearing of such applications will be done via telephone.

Court of Appeal for British Columbia

Updated notice to the public regarding the Court of Appeal’s response to COVID-19
The court has introduced changes to its operations with respect to the application of Ministerial Order No. M086 as regards the suspension of timelines to commence civil or family proceedings.

Alberta

Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta

Processing of Master and Justice Consent Orders by email
Effective immediately, Master and Justice Consent Orders may be processed via email. Upon submission by counsel, the clerks office will review such orders and then forward them to the master or justice concerned for electronic signing.

Ontario

Ontario Court of Justice

COVID-19 Notices and Updates
The court is restricting public access to the courthouses, and only those who fall under the identified exceptions are allowed to visit. The court is also strictly implementing physical distancing measures inside the courtrooms. The court’s measures to reduce the number of people present in the courthouses have also been revised as of Mar. 28. More information may be found here: COVID-19 Pandemic — Scheduling of Criminal Matters in the Ontario Court of Justice and COVID-19 Pandemic — Scheduling of Family Matters in the Ontario Court of Justice.

Ontario Superior Court of Justice

Letter from Geoffrey B. Morawetz, Chief Justice of the Superior Court of Justice, to the members of the legal community in Ontario
Chief Justice Morawetz wrote that, by Apr. 2, he expects to release further notices to the profession which will detail the court’s plan for expanded virtual courts, which will take effect on Apr. 6. As for now, the court’s Council of Regional Senior Judges is currently discussing how the court may expand its operations to ensure access to justice is not impeded.

Court of Appeal for Ontario

Practice Direction Concerning Extensions of Time in Civil Proceedings in the Court of Appeal for Ontario
Given that Ontario Regulation 73/20 covers the suspension of timelines, subject to the discretion of the court responsible for the proceeding, for as long as the emergency declared by the government lasts, the Chief Justice of Ontario and President of the Court of Appeal for Ontario provided guidance with regard to which timelines have been suspended and which ones haven’t been suspended, such as those covering urgent family law appeals.

Notice about Urgent Family Law Appeals
Urgent family law appeals aren’t covered by the automatic time extensions provided under Ontario Regulation 73/20 and will therefore still be heard by the court. Parties to family law appeals that may potentially be urgent should email the court certain information, which is described in the notice linked above. Such persons should ensure that all other parties to the appeal are copied on the email. The notice also enumerates matters which are likely to be considered urgent.

Recent articles & video

Exclusion of casino managers from Quebec’s labour regime constitutional: SCC

Yukon Supreme Court orders release of student contact information in class action lawsuit

Ontario Superior Court rejects worker's psychological impairment claim from a workplace injury

BC Supreme Court clarifies when spousal and child support obligations should end

Federal Court of Appeal rejects employee's complaint of union's failure to fairly represent him

Alberta Court of King's Bench rejects Calderbank offer in medical negligence case

Most Read Articles

BC Supreme Court upholds mother’s will against son's claims for greater inheritance

BC Supreme Court clarifies when spousal and child support obligations should end

2024 Canadian Law Awards Excellence Awardees revealed

Jennifer King at Gowling WLG on ESG and being recognized as a Top 25 Most Influential Lawyer